Skip to main content

Is airlyft.one a Scam? Security Check Results - AirLyft Official Reviews

airlyft.one favicon

Is airlyft.one Safe? Security Analysis for AirLyft Official

Check if airlyft.one is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandsmall
ReactNext.jsSwiper.jsGoogle reCAPTCHA EnterpriseMixpanel analytics
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:37:06 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

AirLyft is a technology platform focused on blockchain community engagement and campaign participation, offering users opportunities to earn rewards such as tokens, NFTs, and merchandise. The platform targets crypto enthusiasts and blockchain project communities, positioning itself as a niche player facilitating interactive campaigns and community growth. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, leveraging AWS S3 for media hosting and integrating analytics and bot protection tools such as Mixpanel and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and security headers, though improvements like enabling DNSSEC and publishing privacy and vulnerability disclosure policies are recommended. The domain is privacy protected but consistent with the business profile and age. Overall, the website is professional and functional but lacks some compliance documentation and direct contact information.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsSwiper.jsGoogle reCAPTCHA EnterpriseMixpanel analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

AirLyft operates in the blockchain technology sector, providing a platform for communities and projects to run campaigns and reward participants. Its business model revolves around engagement and incentivization through digital assets. The platform shows growth potential with active campaigns and partnerships, including a Polkadot subdomain. Revenue streams likely include platform fees or partnerships. The target audience includes blockchain users, NFT collectors, and crypto communities. The company is relatively young, founded in 2021, and maintains a consistent brand presence. Strategic partnerships and a focus on user engagement are key competitive advantages.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and standard security headers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of published security policies such as vulnerability disclosure or incident response reduce overall security transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The platform would benefit from formalizing security policies and improving DNS security to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

AirLyft Official

Description:

Discover the latest and greatest projects in this space, participate and stand a chance to win exciting rewards in the form of Tokens, NFTs, Merchandise and more. The platform enables users to contribute to communities and campaigns to earn rewards such as NFTs, tokens, and whitelists.

Key Services:
Community creation and managementCampaign hosting and participationReward distribution (Tokens, NFTs, Merchandise)User engagement through quizzes, contests, and whitelist opportunities
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsSwiper.jsGoogle reCAPTCHA EnterpriseMixpanel analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
AWS S3 (for image hosting)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of privacy protection in WHOIS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
MixpanelGoogle Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Mixpanel
Marketing Tools:
Mixpanel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a blockchain community and campaign platform with rewards

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.in ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(414 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:35.81.55.198
Name Servers:
dns1.p04.nsone.net
dns2.p04.nsone.net
dns3.p04.nsone.net
dns4.p04.nsone.net
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1660164162, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:80ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:zoho.in ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, ensuring good performance and SEO. Media assets are hosted on AWS S3, and analytics are implemented via Mixpanel and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation clarity. Some technical debt is noted in missing DNSSEC and incomplete privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but can be enhanced with additional security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website