Skip to main content

Is aishouqi.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 首汽环球(北京)汽车租赁有限公司 Reviews

aishouqi.com favicon

Is aishouqi.com Safe? Security Analysis for 首汽环球(北京)汽车租赁有限公司

Check if aishouqi.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationChinamedium
jQuery 1.7.2Owl CarouselFancybox 3Font AwesomeLine Awesome+1 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 10:00:49 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

首汽环球(北京)汽车租赁有限公司是一家成立于2014年的专业汽车租赁服务供应商,主要面向北京地区的企业、政府机构及团体客户,提供旅游包车、商务用车、会议租车及机场接送等多样化服务。公司以丰富的车型选择和透明的价格体系为核心竞争力,致力于为客户提供安全、便捷和高品质的出行体验。网站内容丰富,涵盖详细的车型介绍、价格信息及客户案例,体现出较强的业务专业性和市场定位。技术上,网站基于WordPress平台,使用多种常见的前端库和插件,具备良好的移动端适配和用户体验,但部分技术组件如jQuery版本较旧,存在升级空间。安全方面,网站未显示安全头信息,且缺少隐私及Cookie政策,存在一定的合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,影响域名注册透明度和信任度。整体来看,网站业务成熟,技术实现合理,但安全和合规方面需加强以提升整体风险防范能力。

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.7.2Owl CarouselFancybox 3Font AwesomeLine AwesomeWordPress 6.8.2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

首汽环球在北京汽车租赁市场占据重要位置,服务对象涵盖国企、央企及政府部门,体现其较强的市场认可度和客户基础。其业务模式以多样化租赁方案和增值服务为特色,满足不同客户需求。公司通过官网展示丰富的车型和价格信息,增强客户信任。合作伙伴和友情链接显示其在本地行业内的良好网络。缺乏公开的隐私政策和安全声明可能影响部分客户的信任感。未来发展可聚焦于数字化转型和安全合规提升,以巩固市场地位。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@163.com

Phone Numbers (2)

400*******
010*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站当前安全措施有限,未检测到关键安全头部配置,且使用的jQuery版本较旧,可能存在安全漏洞。缺少隐私政策和Cookie同意机制,存在合规风险。未发现明显的敏感数据泄露或恶意代码。建议加强HTTPS配置验证,更新前端库,完善隐私合规文件,并考虑发布安全事件响应和漏洞披露渠道,以提升整体安全成熟度和客户信任。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

完善并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策,确保符合GDPR及相关法规要求

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

首汽环球(北京)汽车租赁有限公司

Description:

首汽环球(北京)汽车租赁有限公司简称首汽环球,成立于2014年,是北京专业性综合性汽车租赁服务的供应商之一,提供短租自驾、定向长租、商务用车、公车改革、融资租赁、旅游包车、机场接送、会议用车等多种业务。

Key Services:
旅游包车商务用车会议租车机场接送短租自驾定向长租司机代驾
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.7.2Owl CarouselFancybox 3Font AwesomeLine AwesomeWordPress 6.8.2
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

19 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:8.140.28.179
Name Servers:
dns31.hichina.comDNS only
dns32.hichina.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:475ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于WordPress 6.8.2构建,使用了jQuery 1.7.2、Owl Carousel、Fancybox 3等前端库,支持响应式设计,移动端体验良好。SEO基础良好,包含关键词和描述元标签。性能表现中等,页面加载时间合理。缺乏现代安全头部配置和隐私合规机制。技术栈较为传统,存在升级和现代化改进空间。整体技术架构稳定,适合当前业务需求,但需关注安全和合规更新以降低潜在风险。
Analyze Another Website