Skip to main content

Is aiuc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - aiuc.com Reviews

aiuc.com favicon

Is aiuc.com Safe? Security Analysis for AIUC | AI agent standard & insurance

Check if aiuc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
FramerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 12:59:03 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

AIUC is a technology-focused business specializing in certifying and insuring AI agents to facilitate secure adoption. The website presents a clear business purpose but contains minimal content and lacks detailed business or contact information. The technical infrastructure leverages modern tools such as Framer for design and Cloudflare for DNS, with Google Analytics integrated for user tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and domain protections in place, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

FramerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

AIUC operates in a niche market providing certification and insurance services for AI agents, targeting businesses and developers in the AI sector. The domain age and registration details support a stable business presence since 2002. The business model appears to be service-oriented, focusing on trust and risk mitigation for AI technologies. The lack of detailed contact or corporate information limits deeper business intelligence insights. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and has domain status protections that prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS to spoofing risks. No security headers were detected, and there is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. Google Analytics tracking is present, but no explicit user consent mechanism is found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

AIUC certifies and insures AI agents to unlock secure adoption.

Key Services:
AI agent certificationAI agent insurance
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
FramerGoogle AnalyticsCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses Framer for design and hosting assets

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(489 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:31.43.161.6, 31.43.160.6
Name Servers:
irena.ns.cloudflare.com
yoxall.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2380532316, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:144ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Framer, a modern design and prototyping platform, and is hosted with assets served via Cloudflare DNS. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site has basic mobile optimization and SEO metadata but lacks advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident critical technical issues. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt and security risk. The site would benefit from modernization efforts focusing on security hardening and compliance enhancements.
Analyze Another Website