Skip to main content

Is akoms.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - akoms.lv Reviews

A

Is akoms.lv Safe? Security Analysis for -:- A KOMS -:- Datortehnikas apkalpošana -:- Mājas lapas -:- Datortehnika -:-

Check if akoms.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyLatviasmall
HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:56:06 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website akoms.lv represents a small Latvian IT service provider specializing in computer hardware servicing, web development, digital design, and hosting services. The content is primarily in Latvian and targets local businesses or individuals seeking technology and web solutions. The site is basic in design and content, with limited navigation and no detected contact information or detailed company data. Technically, the site uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, including Google Analytics for visitor tracking. There is a cookie consent banner indicating some level of privacy awareness, but no privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or HTTPS confirmation in the provided data. WHOIS information could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site appears functional but basic, with room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on IT services and web development for Latvian clients. The business model is service-oriented, offering website creation, digital design, hosting, and computer servicing. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. The lack of contact details and certifications limits trust signals. The use of Google Analytics suggests some digital maturity, but the absence of modern frameworks or CMS indicates a traditional or legacy technical approach. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the data. The company targets local Latvian-speaking customers, likely small businesses or individuals.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low to moderate. The presence of a cookie consent banner is positive for privacy compliance, but the absence of privacy policy, terms of service, and security headers is a concern. No HTTPS status was confirmed, which is critical for secure communications. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The use of Google Analytics implies some data collection but with minimal tracking. Overall, the site lacks advanced security controls and transparency, posing moderate risk especially if handling sensitive client data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce HTTPS across the entire website to secure user communications.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Izstrādājam mājas lapas atbilstoši Jūsu biznesa nepieciešamībai. Par mūsu darbu kvalitāti liecina mūsu klientu atsauksmes.

Key Services:
mājas lapasdigitālais dizainsuzturēšanatehnoloģiju risinājumidatortehnikas apkalpošanaserviss
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScriptGoogle Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'default' uses 1008-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.221 +a +mx +ip4:85.31.97.21 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1008-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.221
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: akoms.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071700, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:183ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.221 +a +mx +ip4:85.31.97.21 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, without evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking. The site includes a cookie consent banner implemented via JavaScript. Performance appears moderate but no explicit metrics are available. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. No forms or interactive elements were found, limiting data collection risks but also user engagement. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is simple and functional but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website