Skip to main content

Is akvilona.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Akvilona Reviews

A

Is akvilona.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Akvilona

Check if akvilona.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviasmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryAvada themeFusion Builder
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:37:06 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Akvilona is a Latvian healing center and educational organization focused on spiritual healing, professional training, and community events. The website presents a well-structured platform with rich content including news, events, testimonials, and educational resources. It targets individuals interested in healing and spiritual development, operating primarily as a small-sized entity in the healthcare and education sectors. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder, with SEO optimized via Yoast plugin and structured data. The site is mobile-friendly and offers a good user experience. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryAvada themeFusion Builder

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Akvilona operates as a niche healing and educational center with a focus on professional healing training and community engagement through events and festivals. Its business model appears non-profit or educational, serving a Latvian-speaking audience with multilingual support. The organization maintains active social media channels and publishes regular updates and testimonials, indicating a stable community presence. The lack of WHOIS data limits external verification, but the website content and structure suggest a legitimate and established entity founded in 2003. Partnerships with professional healing leagues and event organizations enhance its credibility. Growth indicators include ongoing events, exhibitions, and academic programs.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@inbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716727****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. Forms appear limited to search functionality without sensitive data collection. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor contact channels for security issues. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, privacy notices, and incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Akvilona

Description:

Dziedniecība

Key Services:
Healing center servicesProfessional healing academyEvents and festivalsEducational lectures and publications
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryAvada themeFusion Builder
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple pages

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.24.36
Name Servers:
cloudns.hostnet.lvDNS only
cloudns2.hostnet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: mail.akvilona.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025072201, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:392ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using the Avada theme and Fusion Builder, indicating a modern and flexible infrastructure. The use of Yoast SEO plugin and structured JSON-LD data shows attention to SEO best practices. The site loads with moderate performance and is optimized for mobile devices. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information available. The site uses jQuery and standard web technologies. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking scripts, which may reflect a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing automation. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests areas for modernization and compliance improvement.
Analyze Another Website