Is ala.org Safe? Security Analysis for American Library Association
Check if ala.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The American Library Association (ALA) website serves as a comprehensive platform for library advocacy, membership services, education, conferences, awards, and grants. It targets library professionals, supporters, and the general public interested in library-related issues. The site is well-branded, content-rich, and professionally designed, reflecting its position as the largest membership association in the US library industry. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and some security best practices, though explicit security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is evident with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern but likely due to query failure rather than privacy protection. Overall, the site is trustworthy, safe, and professionally maintained.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
ALA holds a dominant market position in the library sector as a large non-profit membership organization. Its business model revolves around membership dues, advocacy, publishing, conferences, and educational offerings. The website links to several trusted partner domains and uses multiple marketing and analytics tools to engage its audience. The organization demonstrates strong content quality and branding consistency, supporting its credibility and influence in the library community.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS and uses several third-party scripts for analytics and marketing. Security headers are partially implemented but could be enhanced for better protection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a publicly visible security policy or incident response contact, which could be areas for improvement. Overall, the security posture is good but not exemplary.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
American Library Association
Awards, publishing, and conferences: ALA membership advocates to ensure access to information for all
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
excellent
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of secure cookies (implied)
- No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is professionally designed and content-rich
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration
LOWCurrent value: "max-age=300"
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 73 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Weak SPF Policy
HIGHSPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings