Skip to main content

Is alenakaikova.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Alena Kaikova Reviews

alenakaikova.lv favicon

Is alenakaikova.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Alena Kaikova

Check if alenakaikova.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle FontsFont Awesome
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:25:12 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website alenakaikova.lv appears to be a personal or professional portfolio site for an individual named Alena Kaikova. The site is designed with a consistent branding style and uses modern web technologies such as Google Fonts and Font Awesome icons. The content is primarily informational, targeting a general audience likely interested in the services or portfolio of the individual. The technical infrastructure is moderate, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks, and the site appears mobile-optimized with basic accessibility features. Security posture is average due to lack of visible security headers and absence of privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle FontsFont Awesome

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business model appears to be centered on personal branding or service offering by an individual, with no explicit commercial or e-commerce components detected. The market position is not clearly defined, and no partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The site does not display trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The target audience is general, possibly clients or collaborators interested in the individual's work. The lack of contact information and privacy policies may limit user trust and engagement. There are no detected analytics or marketing tools, suggesting a low level of digital marketing maturity.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (3)

f*****@2x.png
a*****@gmail.com
a*****@live.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712999****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is basic. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from URL but not confirmed in data), but no security headers were detected in the provided content. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. No tracking or analytics scripts were found, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Recommendations include implementing security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to improve security posture and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Alena Kaikova

Description:

Personal or professional website of Alena Kaikova, likely showcasing services or portfolio.

Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle FontsFont Awesome
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 80 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.140.166
Name Servers:
ns1.dns-parking.comDNS only
ns2.dns-parking.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025072401, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard HTML5 and CSS3 with external fonts loaded from fonts.bunny.net and icons from Font Awesome. No CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks were detected. The site appears to be hosted on a platform that serves static content with images hosted on Google Cloud Storage and leadconnectorhq.com CDN. Performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimization scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta viewport and title tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags found. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing privacy compliance features.
Analyze Another Website