Skip to main content

Is alisone.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - alisone.lv Reviews

A

Is alisone.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Visitor anti-robot validation

Check if alisone.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:25:35 PM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website alisone.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, indicating that visitors' IP addresses are blocked for security reasons and require CAPTCHA validation to proceed. This suggests the site is protected against automated bots and potential cyber threats but also indicates possible prior abuse or attacks. The page content is minimal and focused solely on security validation, with no visible business or contact information. The technical infrastructure includes outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The security posture shows strengths in bot mitigation via CAPTCHA but weaknesses due to outdated software and lack of visible security headers or privacy policies. Overall, the site is currently inaccessible for normal browsing without passing the security challenge, limiting content and business insights.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the security challenge page and lack of business content, detailed business intelligence is limited. The site appears to be protected by BitNinja security services, possibly indicating a focus on cybersecurity or hosting protection. No company name, contact details, or business model information is available. The presence of multiple CMS metadata tags suggests legacy or multi-platform usage. The target audience is general internet users attempting to access the site. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate with the presence of a BitNinja CAPTCHA challenge effectively blocking automated and potentially malicious traffic. However, the use of outdated CMS versions (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) introduces significant vulnerabilities. No security headers are detected, and HTTPS enforcement cannot be confirmed from the content. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v2, which is a standard bot mitigation tool. Overall, while the site employs some security best practices, critical improvements are needed to address legacy software risks and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade all CMS platforms to supported, secure versions to eliminate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

BitNinja Detected

Page is a security CAPTCHA challenge by BitNinja indicating IP blocking and requiring CAPTCHA validation to proceed.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

The page is a security CAPTCHA validation page indicating the visitor's IP is blocked for security reasons and requires CAPTCHA completion to be delisted.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5DrupalGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle reCAPTCHA v2
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security check by BitNinja.IO

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked behind a BitNinja CAPTCHA security challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:213.227.132.36 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:95.211.208.241
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: alisone.lv

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:95.211.208.241 include:relay.mailchannels.net +a +mx +ip4:213.227.132.36 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and pose security risks. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and primarily serves the CAPTCHA challenge. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags beyond basic keywords and description. The hosting provider is not identified. The site lacks modern frameworks or platforms and shows signs of technical debt and potential security risks from legacy software.
Analyze Another Website