Skip to main content

Is allerlay.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Allerlay Wonesky Media Reviews

allerlay.com favicon

Is allerlay.com Safe? Security Analysis for Allerlay Wonesky Media

https://allerlay.com

Check if allerlay.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaSwitzerlandsmall
Google Tag ManagerMatomo AnalyticsMauticWP RocketGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:13:44 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Allerlay Wonesky Media appears to be a small media or creative agency based in Switzerland, founded around 2019. The website is built on WordPress and uses modern tracking and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, and Mautic. The site is accessible with no WAF or security challenges blocking content. However, it lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts its privacy compliance score. The domain registration data is consistent and legitimate, with no suspicious patterns detected. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Overall, the website presents a professional appearance but requires enhancements in privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerMatomo AnalyticsMauticWP RocketGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets German-speaking and international audiences with media-related services. The business model is service-oriented, likely focusing on media production or creative services. The website content is basic but professional, with moderate branding consistency. There are no visible trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The domain age aligns with the business founding year, supporting credibility. The company does not appear to have subsidiaries or parent companies listed. Marketing tools and analytics indicate an interest in user engagement and tracking.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (6)

A*****@4x-1344x583.png
A*****@4x-640x278.png
A*****@4x-480x208.png
A*****@4x-768x333.png
A*****@4x-1536x666.png
+1 more emails found

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS) and has domain status clientTransferProhibited, which is positive. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The use of Matomo and Google Tag Manager indicates some level of data collection but without clear privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but lacks transparency and some best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Allerlay Wonesky Media

Description:

The website appears to represent Allerlay Wonesky Media, likely a media or creative agency based on the name and content style. The content is primarily in German with an English alternate page. The business likely targets German-speaking audiences and possibly international clients via English content.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerMatomo AnalyticsMauticWP RocketGoogle Fonts
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerMatomo
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Marketing Tools:
Mautic
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:servers.mcsv.net ?all v=spf1 include:_spf.sui-inter.net include:amazonses.com +mx +a ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:80.74.150.190
Name Servers:
ns1.bernstein.metanet.chDNS only
ns2.bernstein.metanet.chDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.allerlay.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, and Mautic for marketing and analytics. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with preconnect optimizations. The site uses WP Rocket for performance optimization. The technical implementation is modern and includes lazy loading scripts and performance enhancements. Mobile optimization appears good based on responsive CSS. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin. Hosting is via registrar 1API GmbH with DNS servers at bernstein.metanet.ch. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in security configurations.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about allerlay.com

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website