Skip to main content

Is alopharm.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Alopharm Reviews

A

Is alopharm.com Safe? Security Analysis for Alopharm

Check if alopharm.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareLatviasmall
WordPressGoogle FontsJavaScript
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:37:06 PM
31
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Alopharm is a healthcare-related company with a website built on WordPress, providing information about its services, team, compliance, and international presence. The site targets healthcare professionals and partners, positioning itself as a niche regional player with a small company size. The website content is basic and primarily informational, with limited interactive features or detailed business disclosures. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including WordPress CMS and Google Fonts, but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is minimal with no detected security headers or privacy policies, and the site uses HTTPS though SSL configuration details are unknown. No forms or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal user data collection. Overall, the site is functional but lacks comprehensive privacy, security, and compliance measures, which could impact trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGoogle FontsJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company appears to operate in the pharmaceutical or healthcare sector, offering compliance and consulting services with a presence in multiple countries. The business model focuses on service provision to healthcare industry professionals. The website lacks detailed business information such as founding year or parent company, and no certifications or trust indicators are displayed. The absence of social media links and limited contact information suggests a low digital marketing footprint. The company may benefit from enhancing transparency and expanding its digital presence to improve market positioning and customer engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@alopharm.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. It lacks essential security headers and does not provide a privacy policy or cookie consent mechanism, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The absence of tracking and analytics scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence capabilities. The site uses HTTPS, which is a positive security baseline. To improve security posture, the company should implement security headers, establish clear privacy and cookie policies, and provide incident response contacts. These steps will enhance compliance and build user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Alopharm

Description:

Alopharm appears to be a company operating in the pharmaceutical or healthcare sector, offering services related to compliance, capabilities, and team expertise with a presence in multiple countries.

Key Services:
ComplianceCapabilitiesConsultingTeam expertise
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGoogle FontsJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses WordPress CMS with custom theme

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:31.31.196.23
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-c1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-c2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-c3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-c4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 13, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:417ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses Google Fonts for typography. The site loads JavaScript files for emoji support and theme functionality. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is limited due to meta robots noindex,nofollow tags and lack of structured data or Open Graph metadata. No analytics or tracking technologies are detected, indicating minimal data collection. The site lacks advanced frameworks or platforms and does not expose any forms or user input fields. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in SEO, accessibility, and security implementations.
Analyze Another Website