Is alpha.com Safe? Security Analysis for 403 - Forbidden
Check if alpha.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The website at alpha.com is currently inaccessible to users, presenting a 403 Forbidden error page that blocks access to any meaningful content. This prevents any direct analysis of business offerings, contact information, or user engagement features. The domain is long-established, created in 1997, and registered through CSC Corporate Domains, Inc., a reputable registrar. However, the lack of accessible content and absence of privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies indicate a minimal digital presence or a site under restricted access. Technically, the site does not expose any scripts, analytics, or marketing tools, and no security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the provided data. This suggests a basic or placeholder hosting setup without active content delivery or security hardening. The security posture is weak due to the absence of visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and the domain does not have DNSSEC enabled. Overall, the site’s current state limits trust and usability, and it is recommended to address access restrictions and implement standard security and privacy practices to improve credibility and compliance.
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Due to the 403 Forbidden error page, no business intelligence data such as company name, services, market position, or target audience can be extracted from the website content. The domain’s age suggests a potentially established entity, but no public-facing information is available to assess competitive advantages or business model. The lack of contact details or social media presence further limits insights into customer engagement or partnership ecosystems. The domain is registered with a corporate registrar, which is typical for legitimate businesses, but the absence of accessible content and policies reduces perceived professionalism and trustworthiness.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of the website is currently poor. The site is inaccessible due to a 403 Forbidden error, which may be intentional for access control but also prevents user interaction. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security are detected. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity to enhance domain security. SSL configuration details are not provided, and it is unclear if HTTPS is enforced. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security and compliance features, exposing it to potential risks and reducing user trust.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Remove or properly configure access restrictions to allow legitimate user access or provide informative error pages.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Generic Detected
The website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No WAF vendor branding detected but content is inaccessible.
Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com
Business Insights
poor
Technical Stack
poor
Security Assessment
0Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website content is blocked with a 403 Forbidden error page.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
Complex SPF record
LOWToo many include statements can cause lookup limits
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 43 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Critical Service Exposed: MySQL
CRITICALPort 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server
Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL
CRITICALPort 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings