Skip to main content

Is alseva.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - alseva.pl Reviews

A

Is alseva.pl Safe? Security Analysis for Waiting for the redirectiron...

Check if alseva.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherPolandsmall
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 3:54:38 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website alseva.pl currently presents a security challenge page that blocks direct access to its content, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or similar security mechanism. The visible content is minimal and primarily consists of an automatic redirect with a browser integrity check script. The site references legacy CMS platforms Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, both of which are outdated and pose significant security risks if still in use. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, nor is there any visible contact or business information. The domain is registered through Globtel Internet Szymon Hersztek in Poland since 2015, which aligns with a small business or service entity but the website itself lacks active content or clear business presence.

Detected Technologies

Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

There is insufficient business information on the website to determine market positioning, business model, or target audience. The domain age suggests a stable registration, but the lack of visible content and contact details limits insights into the company's operations or competitive advantages. The external link to bitninja.io suggests reliance on third-party security services. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or certifications are indicated.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak due to the use of outdated CMS versions and absence of visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement in the HTML content. The presence of a security challenge page indicates some level of protection, but the lack of modern security best practices and missing policies reduces overall security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no data protection officer contact is found. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for domain security enhancement.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Upgrade all CMS platforms to supported, secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page shows a security check with automatic redirect and browser integrity check script, indicating a WAF or security challenge blocking direct access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Description:

Joomla!

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla 1.5WordPress 2.5JavaScript
Frameworks:
JoomlaWordPress
Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
25/100
Best Practices:
  • Browser integrity check script
  • Automatic redirect with countdown

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a security challenge page with automatic redirect.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:217.146.67.107 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Forensic Reports:dmarc@alseva.pl

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 12 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(216 days)

DNS Records

A Records:194.181.228.125
Name Servers:
ns5.webd.plDNS only
ns7.webd.plDNS only
MX Records:
0: alseva-pl.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025051800, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:217.146.67.107 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses legacy CMS technologies (Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5) which are no longer supported and expose the site to security risks. The hosting registrar is Globtel Internet Szymon Hersztek, a Polish provider. The site employs a JavaScript-based browser integrity check and automatic redirect, typical of WAF challenge pages. Performance and mobile optimization are poor due to minimal content and outdated design. SEO and accessibility are also poor, with no meta tags beyond basic keywords and no ARIA or accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal data collection or user tracking.
Analyze Another Website