Skip to main content

Is alskrankheit.net a Scam? Security Check Results - alskrankheit.net Reviews

A

Is alskrankheit.net Safe? Security Analysis for Gesundheitsratgeber

Check if alskrankheit.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareN/asmall
HTML5CSS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 5:54:05 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.alskrankheit.net operates as a German-language health information portal offering a wide range of articles on topics such as alternative medicine, cancer, mental health, dental care, and public health. It targets a general audience seeking health advice and information. The site structure is straightforward with multiple categorized sections, but the overall design and content quality are basic and lack professional polish. Technically, the site uses simple HTML and CSS without advanced frameworks or CMS detected. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, which poses a risk to user data security and trust. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies further indicates low compliance with modern data protection standards. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is not registered, which is a significant red flag for legitimacy and trustworthiness. No contact information or social media presence is provided, limiting user engagement and support options.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The site appears to be a small-scale health content publisher focused on providing informational articles rather than commercial services. Its market position is niche within German-speaking health information providers. The business model likely relies on content publishing possibly supported by external advertising or affiliate links, as indicated by external domains linked in the footer. There is no evidence of direct monetization or partnerships with recognized healthcare entities. The lack of verifiable business information and domain registration data limits confidence in its operational transparency and credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak. The absence of HTTPS means data transmitted between users and the site is not encrypted, exposing users to interception risks. No security headers are present to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There are no visible forms or input fields, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a concern for handling potential security incidents. Overall, the site does not follow best practices for web security or privacy.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website providing health-related articles and guides covering alternative medicine, bites and stings, cancer, dental health, diet and nutrition, family health, healthcare industry, mental health, public health and safety, and surgeries.

Key Services:
Health articlesMedical informationAlternative medicine guidance
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is in German and covers a broad range of health topics.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:alskrankheit.net
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/17/2025 (45 days)
SANs:alskrankheit.net, *.alskrankheit.net

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(364 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.181.20, 104.21.64.99
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3032::6815:4063, 2606:4700:3033::ac43:b514
Name Servers:
asa.ns.cloudflare.com
titan.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2376340148, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. The site is moderately optimized for navigation but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are detected, indicating minimal tracking or dynamic content. The site performance is likely moderate given the simple structure but mobile optimization is basic. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available from the provided data. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations.
Analyze Another Website