Skip to main content

Is althea.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Althea Reviews

althea.net favicon

Is althea.net Safe? Security Analysis for Althea

Check if althea.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:50:23 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Althea operates a blockchain-based infrastructure platform focused on enabling networked connectivity and tokenized utilities. Their flagship product, Althea L1, is a high-availability Hybrid EVM blockchain designed for infrastructure and connectivity use cases. The company has been active since 2018, providing blockchain-enabled internet access across multiple US states and countries. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy, although the website content and branding appear professional and consistent with a technology business. Overall, the site presents a credible business offering innovative blockchain infrastructure solutions but should improve transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Althea positions itself as an innovative player in the blockchain and telecommunications sectors, targeting network operators, infrastructure investors, and technology developers. Their business model leverages blockchain technology to tokenize network utilities and enable decentralized ownership of infrastructure assets. The company has a growing community and presence in multiple US states and countries, indicating expansion and adoption. Partnerships such as Hawk Networks suggest ecosystem collaboration. Revenue streams likely include blockchain infrastructure services and utility tokenization. The company emphasizes technology innovation and community engagement as competitive advantages.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of cookie consent mechanisms indicate gaps in security best practices and privacy compliance. No direct contact emails or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with enhanced headers, privacy compliance, and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Althea

Description:

Althea L1 is a high-availability Hybrid EVM blockchain purpose-built for networked infrastructure and connectivity. Since 2018, Althea's technology has brought blockchain-enabled internet access to thousands of homes and challenging topographies. They offer tokenization of utilities and liquid infrastructure enabling ownership of network assets like fiber optic cables and cell towers.

Key Services:
Hybrid EVM blockchain (Althea L1)Liquid Infrastructure for tokenized utilitiesBlockchain-enabled internet access
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com ?all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:?all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
laura.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
lloyd.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: in1-smtp.messagingengine.com
20: in2-smtp.messagingengine.com
SOA:Serial: 2382533181, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:100ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.messagingengine.com ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and good performance. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and images. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and modern web presence but lacks some advanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website