Skip to main content

Is alumlabs.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Alum Labs Reviews

alumlabs.io favicon

Is alumlabs.io Safe? Security Analysis for Alum Labs

Check if alumlabs.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSS
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 1:17:20 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Alum Labs is a specialized technology service provider focused on blockchain node operation and network security, particularly in Delegated Proof of Stake (DPOS) networks. The company positions itself as a network-driven operator, refusing institutional clients to dedicate full engineering resources to supported blockchain ecosystems. Their key services include node operation, security testing, post-launch optimization, custom integrations, and open source tooling. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting blockchain foundations and ecosystem participants. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, offering excellent performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though some security headers are missing and privacy policies are absent. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in this sector, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, Alum Labs presents a credible and trustworthy profile with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Alum Labs operates in the niche market of blockchain infrastructure, focusing on node operation and network security for DPOS-based networks. Their refusal to work with institutional clients differentiates them from competitors, emphasizing a community and network-first approach. Partnerships with ecosystem collaborators like L2Labs, Fastpool, StackingDAO, and Meta Pool indicate strong integration within the blockchain ecosystem. The business model is service-oriented, providing technical and operational support to blockchain foundations. The website content and design suggest a small but highly specialized company with deep technical expertise. The lack of explicit company registration or physical address information is typical for blockchain service providers but may impact some trust perceptions. The company leverages social media channels like Telegram and X for communication and community engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a secure third-party form service (Formspree) for contact submissions, reducing risk of data interception. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is acceptable but limits external verification. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and providing incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Alum Labs

Description:

Node operators, experts in DPOS. High-performance infrastructure and engineering resources to help foundations secure and scale their networks. A collective of crypto-native engineers and operators with 10+ years of experience across staking, tokenomics, and network security. They refuse to work with institutions, dedicating 100% of engineering resources to supported networks.

Key Services:
Node operationSecurity testingPost-launch optimizationCustom integrationsOpen source tooling
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptCSS
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure contact form using Formspree
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:453ac3bf2ec24547807284c3b461322f@dmarc-reports.cloudflare.net

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.alumlabs.io
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid Until:9/20/2026 (378 days)
SANs:*.alumlabs.io, alumlabs.io

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(328 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.240.92, 3.164.240.29, 3.164.240.46, 3.164.240.38
AAAA Records:2600:9000:278f:2e00:19:4910:3340:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:3c00:19:4910:3340:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:7600:19:4910:3340:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:7c00:19:4910:3340:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:9a00:19:4910:3340:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:bc00:19:4910:3340:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:e000:19:4910:3340:93a1, 2600:9000:278f:f600:19:4910:3340:93a1
Name Servers:
beth.ns.cloudflare.com
gabe.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
0: alumlabs-io.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2382630992, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:147ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.privateemail.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring a performant and responsive user experience. The site loads quickly and is well optimized for mobile devices. The use of Formspree for contact forms offloads form handling securely. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Technical debt appears low with clean markup and no broken elements. Opportunities exist to improve SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and enhancing meta tags. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a technical and compliance gap. Overall, the technical implementation is solid and modern with minor areas for enhancement.
Analyze Another Website