Skip to main content

Is amalgam.online a Scam? Security Check Results - Amalgam Reviews

A

Is amalgam.online Safe? Security Analysis for Amalgam

Check if amalgam.online is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WordPressjQuerySwiper.jsStripe.js
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 3:36:32 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Amalgam is a small-scale creative or e-commerce business represented by a WordPress-based website featuring artistic visual content and pages for ordering and news updates. The site leverages modern web technologies including jQuery, Swiper.js, and Stripe.js for payment processing, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Mobile optimization and user experience are good, though content depth and business information are limited. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is functional and safe but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQuerySwiper.jsStripe.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business appears to operate in a creative or e-commerce sector, targeting a general audience with product ordering and news dissemination. The lack of detailed business descriptions and contact information limits insight into market positioning and revenue streams. The use of Stripe suggests online payment capabilities. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. Growth indicators and strategic positioning cannot be assessed from available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communications, and uses reputable third-party libraries and payment integration via Stripe. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, security maturity is moderate but can be improved.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Amalgam

Description:

The website appears to represent a creative or artistic business named Amalgam, showcasing visual content such as an animation GIF. The site includes pages titled 'Order' and 'News', suggesting a business model involving product or service ordering and updates/news dissemination. No explicit detailed business description is provided in the content.

Key Services:
Order processingNews updates
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQuerySwiper.jsStripe.js
Frameworks:
LayTheme
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based creative or e-commerce site with limited public business information.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(126 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:67.205.25.197
Name Servers:
ns1.dreamhost.com
ns2.dreamhost.com
ns3.dreamhost.com
MX Records:
0: mx2.mailchannels.net
0: mx1.mailchannels.net
SOA:Serial: 2024052100, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:236ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the LayTheme framework and several LayTheme plugins for carousel, lightbox, and magnetic slides functionality. It uses jQuery and Swiper.js for frontend interactivity and Stripe.js for payment processing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and lazy loading for images. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no structured JSON-LD data. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Analyze Another Website