Skip to main content

Is ameri.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - ameri.lv Reviews

A

Is ameri.lv Safe? Security Analysis for AMERI KNITWEAR – Exclusive knitwear producer

Check if ameri.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
WordPressBootstrap 4Google AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 4:06:46 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website ameri.lv is a WordPress-based site using Bootstrap framework and includes common tracking technologies such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site content is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact information is provided, which limits user trust and compliance with privacy regulations. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing a full domain legitimacy assessment. The site appears to be small-scale with basic content and moderate technical implementation. Security posture is weak due to missing security headers and lack of incident response information. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressBootstrap 4Google AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to limited content and lack of business description, the market positioning and business model of ameri.lv cannot be fully determined. The site appears to be a small entity possibly in a niche or local market. The presence of tracking scripts indicates some level of marketing or user analytics. No partnerships or certifications are evident. The absence of contact details and policies suggests a low maturity level in business operations and compliance. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not identifiable from the available data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of ameri.lv is basic with HTTPS likely enabled (inferred from script sources using HTTPS), but no explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of common tracking pixels suggests moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, formal privacy and cookie policies, and incident response mechanisms to improve security maturity and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressBootstrap 4Google AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a ip4:65.108.201.188 include:_spf.google.com include:shops.shopify.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1360-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 73 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:65.109.39.245
Name Servers:
helium.ns.hetzner.deDNS only
hydrogen.ns.hetzner.comDNS only
oxygen.ns.hetzner.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: m.pd.lv
50: m3.pd.lv
SOA:Serial: 2023101800, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:263ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a ip4:65.108.201.188 include:_spf.google.com include:shops.shopify.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:servers.mcsv.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 4 framework, indicating a modern but common technology stack. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for user tracking and marketing analytics. The site appears to be moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not determinable from the HTML content. The site lacks advanced technical security measures such as security headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms.
Analyze Another Website