Skip to main content

Is amiriepas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - AMI Riepas Reviews

amiriepas.lv favicon

Is amiriepas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for AMI Riepas

Check if amiriepas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsBootstrap 4.6
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:59:22 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

AMI Riepas is a small Latvian business specializing in automotive, motorcycle, and industrial tires, along with related products such as batteries, disks, motor oils, transmission oils, auto spare parts, and auto service offerings. The website presents a basic but functional digital presence using modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Bootstrap 4.6. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking access. However, the absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification. The website lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and no explicit contact information is found, which impacts trust and compliance assessments.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsBootstrap 4.6

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets vehicle owners and companies requiring tire and automotive services in Latvia. The model is retail and service provision with a local/regional market focus. The website content is relevant but basic, with no advanced SEO or accessibility features detected. Tracking is implemented via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, indicating some level of marketing and user behavior analysis. The lack of contact details and policies suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS (assumed from external scripts loaded via HTTPS), but no security headers are evident in the HTML content. There is no indication of security policies or incident response contacts. The security posture is basic with recommendations to implement security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and incident response mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

AMI Riepas

Description:

Auto, moto, industriālās riepas, akumulatori, diski, motoreļļas, transmisijas eļļas, auto rezerves daļas, auto servisa pakalpojumi

Key Services:
Auto tiresMotorcycle tiresIndustrial tiresBatteriesDisksMotor oilsTransmission oilsAuto spare partsAuto service
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsBootstrap 4.6
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.205 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:212.7.207.88 +mx +a +ip4:37.48.118.150 +ip4:5.79.96.44 +ip4:5.79.96.49 +ip4:5.79.96.50 +ip4:82.192.64.129 +ip4:85.17.141.3 +ip4:95.217.213.178 +ip6:fe80::9400:ff:fe54:7ce1 +ip6:2a01:4f9:c010:95eb ::1 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc-reports@amiriepas.lv
Forensic Reports:dmarc-reports@amiriepas.lv

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 56 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:95.217.213.178
Name Servers:
ns1.areait.lvDNS only
ns2.areait.lvDNS only
ns3.areait.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: mail.amiriepas.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025071503, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:708ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:83.149.95.205 include:relay.mailchannels.net ip4:212.7.207.88 +mx +a +ip4:37.48.118.150 +ip4:5.79.96.44 +ip4:5.79.96.49 +ip4:5.79.96.50 +ip4:82.192.64.129 +ip4:85.17.141.3 +ip4:95.217.213.178 +ip6:fe80::9400:ff:fe54:7ce1 +ip6:2a01:4f9:c010:95eb ::1 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Nuxt.js, a Vue.js framework, and uses Bootstrap 4.6 for styling. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site appears moderately optimized for mobile devices and loads external scripts asynchronously. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. The absence of security headers and policies indicates technical debt in security best practices.
Analyze Another Website