Skip to main content

Is amsoil.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - AMSOIL INC – EU Reviews

amsoil.eu favicon

Is amsoil.eu Safe? Security Analysis for AMSOIL INC – EU

https://amsoil.eu

Check if amsoil.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyN/amedium
jQueryOwl CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook Pixel+2 more
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 8:21:32 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

AMSOIL INC – EU operates as a regional European website for AMSOIL, a family-owned company specializing in high-performance synthetic lubricants for automotive and motorcycle applications. The company positions itself as an independent premium brand focused on quality, innovation, and customer service through a distributor network. The website provides product information, lookup tools, distributor locators, and educational content targeting vehicle enthusiasts and professionals. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple analytics and consent management tools, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is evident with clear policies and cookie consent. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its audience.

Detected Technologies

jQueryOwl CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook PixelHotjarTrustArc Consent Management

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

AMSOIL INC – EU serves the European market as part of a global network of regional AMSOIL sites. The business model centers on manufacturing and distributing synthetic lubricants via local distributors. The company leverages its independence from large oil conglomerates to emphasize product performance and innovation. The website supports sales and marketing efforts by providing product lookup tools and distributor information. Social media integration and testimonials enhance brand credibility. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests a focus on distributor-mediated customer interactions. The company’s presence across multiple regional domains indicates a broad geographic footprint and localized marketing strategy.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a consent management platform (TrustArc) to comply with GDPR cookie regulations. Tracking and analytics tools include Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, all managed with user consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly present, representing an area for improvement. No public security policy or incident response information is available, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

AMSOIL INC – EU

Description:

AMSOIL specialises in developing high-performance synthetic oils for car lovers, petrol-heads and those who are passionate about performance. The company focuses on fully synthetic oils designed to deliver exceptional wear protection, maximum fuel economy and clean engine parts.

Key Services:
Synthetic lubricants manufacturingDistributor networkProduct lookup guideCustomer support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryOwl CarouselGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Facebook PixelHotjarTrustArc Consent Management
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjarFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelHotjar
Marketing Tools:
TrustArc Consent Management
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 29 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:185.145.13.81
Name Servers:
ns1.eurodns.comDNS only
ns2.eurodns.comDNS only
ns3.eurodns.comDNS only
ns4.eurodns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025040401, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:83ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and TrustArc for analytics and consent management. The site uses responsive design techniques and serves optimized images (WebP format) for performance. DNS and hosting details are not explicitly available, but the domain is registered via EuroDNS S.A., a reputable European registrar. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present, and SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The technical stack is modern and appropriate for the business needs, with opportunities to enhance security headers and accessibility.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about amsoil.eu

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website