Skip to main content

Is amulets.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - amulets.lv Reviews

amulets.lv favicon

Is amulets.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Amulets rotas

Check if amulets.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
jQuery 1.4.2ColorboxGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerBootstrap 4.0.0+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:23:57 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Amulets.lv is a Latvian artisan jewelry e-commerce website specializing in silver, gold, and bronze jewelry with traditional Latvian cultural motifs such as baltic symbols and runes. The business claims over 25 years of operation and offers a variety of handcrafted products including rings, bracelets, earrings, pendants, and amber jewelry. The website is designed with a moderate technical infrastructure using older jQuery, Bootstrap 4, and Google Analytics for tracking. While the site is accessible and well-structured with clear navigation and contact information, it lacks modern security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the site presents a legitimate small retail business with room for security and privacy improvements.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.4.2ColorboxGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerBootstrap 4.0.0FontAwesomeGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on niche artisan jewelry with cultural significance in Latvia. Its business model is e-commerce retail with a local market focus. The website demonstrates consistent branding and a clear product offering targeting general consumers interested in Latvian traditional jewelry. The presence of social media links and a physical address supports credibility. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and absence of advanced security policies suggest a small-scale operation with limited digital maturity. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company could benefit from enhanced digital marketing and security practices to strengthen market position and customer trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@amulets.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

673*****
259*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts, indicating basic security and analytics practices. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or security policy information is available. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or other blocking mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to reduce risk and enhance compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement modern security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Juvelierveikals "Amulets" darbības pamatā vairāk nekā 25 gadus, piedāvā sudraba, zelta un bronzas rotas, tostarp gredzenus, rokassprādzes, auskarus, ķēdītes, kulonus, Nameja gredzenus, Laimes naudiņas, saktas, piespraudes, rotas ar dzintaru un dabīgiem akmeņiem, gatavotas mākslinieku darbnīcā Rīgā, apvienojot mūsdienīgu dizainu ar senajām baltu zīmēm un rūnām.

Key Services:
Jewelry salesCustom artisan jewelry crafting
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.4.2ColorboxGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerBootstrap 4.0.0FontAwesomeGoogle Fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by og:url and script sources using https

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small artisan jewelry e-commerce site focused on Latvian cultural motifs.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:198.20.127.39
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.latnet.lv
20: mx2.latnet.lv
30: mx3.latnet.lv
SOA:Serial: 1690809897, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:231ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a legacy jQuery 1.4.2 library alongside Colorbox for UI elements, Bootstrap 4 for responsive layout, FontAwesome for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking and analytics. The HTML content is well structured with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The technical stack is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website