Skip to main content

Is amzn.to a Scam? Security Check Results - Amazon.com, Inc. Reviews

A

Is amzn.to Safe? Security Analysis for Amazon.com, Inc.

Check if amzn.to is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceUnited Statesenterprise
JavaScriptAmazonUICSM instrumentation scripts
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:48:48 AM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Amazon.com, Inc. is a leading global e-commerce platform founded in 1996, offering a broad range of retail products and digital services. The website content provided is minimal and appears to be a security challenge page, likely due to WAF or bot protection mechanisms, limiting direct content access and analysis. The technical infrastructure includes Amazon's proprietary UI libraries and instrumentation scripts, with resources served over HTTPS from Amazon domains. Security posture is moderate but limited by lack of visible security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive, indicating compliance with standard regulations including GDPR. WHOIS data is unavailable from the provided raw output, which is unusual for a domain of this stature and reduces trust from a technical perspective. Overall, the site is highly credible as a business but the content access limitations and missing WHOIS data reduce the ability to fully assess security and compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptAmazonUICSM instrumentation scripts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Amazon holds a dominant market position in e-commerce with a business model centered on online retail and marketplace services. Its target audience is broad and general, serving consumers worldwide. The company leverages extensive internal technology stacks and cloud infrastructure (AWS) to support its operations. Revenue streams include direct product sales, third-party seller fees, digital content, and cloud services. The affiliate program and developer services indicate a mature partnership ecosystem. Despite the limited content access, the presence of official privacy and terms pages supports a professional and compliant business operation.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@amazon.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture shows use of HTTPS and captcha instrumentation to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of visible security headers and explicit incident response or security policy pages limits transparency. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism on the analyzed page, which may impact privacy compliance. WHOIS data unavailability is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the limited content. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not observable from the provided data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Page content is a minimal captcha validation page indicating a security challenge or WAF protection blocking full content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Company:

Amazon.com, Inc.

Description:

Amazon.com is a global e-commerce platform offering a wide range of products and services including retail goods, digital content, and cloud computing services.

Key Services:
Online retailMarketplace platformDigital content deliveryCloud services (AWS)
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptAmazonUICSM instrumentation scripts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by external resource URLs
  • Use of captcha instrumentation scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
ClientSideMetricsAUIJavascript
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
fls-na.amazon.com
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and appears to be a captcha validation page, indicating a WAF or security challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

72/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf1.amazon.com include:spf2.amazon.com include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:report@dmarc.amazon.com
Forensic Reports:report@dmarc.amazon.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:205.251.242.103, 52.94.236.248, 54.239.28.85
Name Servers:
ns1.amzndns.co.ukDNS only
ns1.amzndns.comDNS only
ns1.amzndns.netDNS only
ns1.amzndns.orgDNS only
ns2.amzndns.co.ukDNS only
ns2.amzndns.comDNS only
ns2.amzndns.netDNS only
ns2.amzndns.orgDNS only
MX Records:
5: amazon-smtp.amazon.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf1.amazon.com include:spf2.amazon.com include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Amazon's proprietary UI framework and client-side instrumentation scripts for metrics and captcha validation. Resources are loaded securely over HTTPS from Amazon-owned domains. The page analyzed is a minimal captcha validation form, indicating a WAF or security challenge is active, which restricts content access. No CMS or third-party frameworks were detected. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but could be improved. SEO meta tags and structured data are absent in the provided HTML, limiting search engine optimization potential. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but the security challenge page limits full technical assessment.
Analyze Another Website