Skip to main content

Is ana.net a Scam? Security Check Results - Association of National Advertisers Reviews

A

Is ana.net Safe? Security Analysis for Association of National Advertisers

Check if ana.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Stateslarge
jQuery 3.6.0Bootstrap 4.6.0VideoJS 8.23.4FontAwesomeGoogle Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Slab, Material Icons)
Analyzed 9/4/2025Completed 12:32:03 AM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Association of National Advertisers (ANA) is a leading non-profit organization dedicated to advancing the marketing industry by providing resources, training, advocacy, and networking opportunities to its members. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content targeting marketing professionals, corporate marketers, and nonprofit organizations. The site offers a wide range of services including membership benefits, events, research insights, and government relations advocacy. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and VideoJS, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience across devices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and incident response information are not evident. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.ana.net is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues, but the professional content and trusted partner affiliations support legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, with recommendations to enhance security headers and transparency around domain registration.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.6.0Bootstrap 4.6.0VideoJS 8.23.4FontAwesomeGoogle Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Slab, Material Icons)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ANA holds a strong market position as a premier marketing association in the United States, serving a large membership base that includes corporate marketers and nonprofit federations. Its business model revolves around membership fees, events, training programs, and proprietary research offerings. The organization leverages partnerships with major industry players such as Amazon Advertising, Google, Meta, and others, enhancing its influence and resource pool. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on thought leadership, advocacy, and professional development, positioning ANA as a key driver of marketing industry standards and growth. Growth indicators include active event calendars, recent research publications, and a robust social media presence. Strategic observations suggest ANA maintains a well-established ecosystem with opportunities to improve transparency and security communications.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent modal that aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and mitigation. The login form uses POST method, indicating secure data submission practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration transparency, which is a potential risk factor. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced header implementation and clearer security governance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Association of National Advertisers

Description:

The ANA sets the agenda for the marketing industry, driving brand and business growth. It harnesses the intelligence and passion of its members to accelerate marketing success and create lasting impact.

Key Services:
Membership benefitsMarketing leadership and practicesEvents and conferencesTraining and developmentMarketing knowledge centerGovernment relations and advocacy
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.6.0Bootstrap 4.6.0VideoJS 8.23.4FontAwesomeGoogle Fonts (Roboto, Roboto Slab, Material Icons)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and external scripts)
  • Cookie consent modal with granular options
  • Login form uses POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Amazon Advertising
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:142.154.205.114 ip4:216.5.40.34 ip4:97.65.79.68 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:re+akvnvd7vp4z@dmarc.postmarkapp.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

HSTS Not Enabled

MEDIUM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) is not configured

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:54.80.243.101, 52.202.239.198
Name Servers:
ns-1368.awsdns-43.orgDNS only
ns-1827.awsdns-36.co.ukDNS only
ns-295.awsdns-36.comDNS only
ns-717.awsdns-25.netDNS only
MX Records:
0: ana.net.1.0001.arsmtp.com
5: ana.net.2.0001.arsmtp.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:108ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:142.154.205.114 ip4:216.5.40.34 ip4:97.65.79.68 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website utilizes a modern technology stack featuring jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 4.6.0, VideoJS for media playback, and FontAwesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography, enhancing visual appeal. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with clear navigation and structured content. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on CDNs for scripts and stylesheets. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience.
Analyze Another Website