Skip to main content

Is anchorbuilderswfl.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Anchor Builders Reviews

anchorbuilderswfl.com favicon

Is anchorbuilderswfl.com Safe? Security Analysis for Anchor Builders

Check if anchorbuilderswfl.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateUnited Statessmall
WordPressElementorjQuerySwiper.jsElementskit+2 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 5:10:22 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Anchor Builders is a luxury custom home builder based in Southwest Florida, specializing in crafting unique homes tailored to clients' lifestyles and visions. With over 35 years of experience, the company positions itself as a premium builder focusing on quality and personalized service. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting affluent home buyers in the region. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and related modern plugins, hosted on HostWP. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, representing a compliance gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorjQuerySwiper.jsElementskitRedux FrameworkBootstrap 5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on custom luxury home construction. Its business model emphasizes limited volume to ensure quality and personalized attention. The website showcases model homes, testimonials, and detailed descriptions of their craftsmanship, indicating a customer-centric approach. Social media presence is primarily on Facebook and Instagram, though Instagram link appears misconfigured. The company has maintained its domain since 1999, indicating stable market presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance with GDPR and other regulations, especially for European visitors.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@anchorbuilders.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of incident response contacts indicate gaps in compliance and security transparency. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Anchor Builders

Description:

Anchor Builders is a luxury custom home builder in Southwest Florida specializing in crafting one-of-a-kind homes designed to reflect clients' vision, lifestyle, and legacy. They emphasize quality, craftsmanship, and personalized service with over 35 years of experience.

Key Services:
Custom home buildingHome design tailored to client lifestyleModel home showcasingCommunity development
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorjQuerySwiper.jsElementskitRedux FrameworkBootstrap 5
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +mx +a +ip4:185.73.9.6 +include:spf.hostns.io +include:edgepilot.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 55 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1243 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:185.73.9.6
Name Servers:
ns1.hostwp.io
ns2.hostwp.io
MX Records:
10: anchorbuilders.com.1.arsmtp.com
20: anchorbuilders.com.2.arsmtp.com
SOA:Serial: 2025062801, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:216ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +mx +a +ip4:185.73.9.6 +include:spf.hostns.io +include:edgepilot.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and several addons like Elementskit and Premium Addons. It uses jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. The site is hosted on HostWP as indicated by the nameservers. Performance is moderate with large images and parallax effects, which may impact load times. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured content but could be enhanced with more semantic markup and alt text improvements. No forms were detected in the provided content, limiting data collection points. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced accessibility.
Analyze Another Website