Skip to main content

Is anchorfluidsystems.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Anchor Fluid Systems Reviews

anchorfluidsystems.com favicon

Is anchorfluidsystems.com Safe? Security Analysis for Anchor Fluid Systems

Check if anchorfluidsystems.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingN/amedium
Google Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentjQuery (implied by legacy scripts)Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) CMS
Analyzed 10/3/2025Completed 4:33:47 PM
71
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Anchor Fluid Systems operates as a specialized manufacturer focusing on hydraulic hoses, couplings, and ferrules for industrial fluid systems. The company targets industrial and commercial customers requiring high-quality hydraulic components. The website reflects a medium-sized manufacturing business with a consistent brand presence and professional content. Technically, the site is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, integrating modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for cookie consent, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The website is accessible, mobile-optimized, and provides a clear navigation structure, although some SEO and accessibility features could be improved. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is implied, no explicit security headers or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, impacting domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the site is professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

Google Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentjQuery (implied by legacy scripts)Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a niche manufacturer in the hydraulic components sector, offering hoses, couplings, and ferrules. The business model centers on product manufacturing and sales to industrial clients. The website's content quality and navigation suggest a focus on user experience for technical buyers. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers may indicate a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The integration of OneTrust and Google Tag Manager shows awareness of privacy and marketing needs. However, the missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain ownership and longevity, which could affect customer trust and partnership opportunities.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

+3902923*****
+3902923*****

Company Registration

VAT Number:

IT 11069880158

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive security indicators. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no publicly available security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, limiting transparency and preparedness. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a critical security and trust concern, as it may indicate domain registration issues or privacy obfuscation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in header implementation, policy publication, and domain registration transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Anchor Fluid Systems

Description:

Designs and manufactures hoses, couplings, and ferrules for hydraulic and fluid systems applications.

Key Services:
Hydraulic hosesCouplingsFerrules
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google Tag ManagerOneTrust Cookie ConsentjQuery (implied by legacy scripts)Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) CMS
Frameworks:
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
OneTrust
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

7/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

50/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:Akamai.cat.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:7/21/2026 (291 days)
SANs:Akamai.cat.com, anchorcoupling.com, anchorfluidsystems.com +26 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
14 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(270 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:184.51.237.176
AAAA Records:2001:2030:21:199::3215, 2001:2030:21:1b1::3215
Name Servers:
dns1.p01.nsone.net
dns2.p01.nsone.net
dns3.p01.nsone.net
dns4.p01.nsone.net
SOA:Serial: 1745294436, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager CMS, a robust enterprise platform. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and OneTrust for cookie consent, reflecting modern marketing and privacy practices. The site includes responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. Performance appears moderate, with some reliance on external resources such as scene7 image hosting and Google Maps API. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML. However, the absence of security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact business operations and trust.
Analyze Another Website