Skip to main content

Is android5.online a Scam? Security Check Results - android5.online Reviews

A

Is android5.online Safe? Security Analysis for Android教程網

Check if android5.online is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTMLCSSJavaScript
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 1:15:22 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website 'Android教程網' is a Chinese-language platform dedicated to providing tutorials and technical articles related to Android programming, Android phone usage, system tutorials, and game development. It targets Android developers and users seeking educational content in this niche. The business model appears to be content publishing without evident monetization or commercial services. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS, resulting in moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS enforcement, absence of security headers, and missing privacy and cookie policies. No contact or trust indicators are present, which limits business credibility. The domain uses privacy-protected WHOIS registration, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.

Detected Technologies

HTMLCSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The site occupies a niche in the technology education sector focused on Android. It leverages a network of related tutorial sites as partners, indicating a small ecosystem of similar content providers. The business model is likely ad-supported or informational, with no direct e-commerce or subscription services evident. The target audience includes Android developers and users in Chinese-speaking regions. Growth indicators or parent company affiliations are not visible. The site’s competitive advantage lies in its focused content but is limited by basic technical implementation and lack of modern digital marketing or analytics tools.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. Forms lack visible protections against CSRF or spam. No incident response or security policies are published. Privacy compliance is minimal with no GDPR indicators or cookie consent mechanisms. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS reduces transparency but is not uncommon for small sites. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce HTTPS redirects site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website provides tutorials and technical articles related to Android programming, Android phones, Android system tutorials, and Android games. It offers guides on Android development, phone usage tips, flashing tutorials, and related technical content.

Key Services:
Android programming tutorialsAndroid phone usage guidesAndroid system tutorialsAndroid game development articles
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTMLCSSJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

65/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:android5.online
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:10/28/2025 (86 days)
SANs:android5.online, *.android5.online

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(490 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.137.64, 104.21.86.221
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3030::6815:56dd, 2606:4700:3034::ac43:8940
Name Servers:
eloise.ns.cloudflare.com
razvan.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2379391841, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:125ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without modern frameworks or CMS. The site includes a JavaScript-based image slider and multiple internal links to tutorial articles. Mobile optimization is basic with a viewport meta tag but no advanced responsive design detected. SEO is basic with a title tag but no meta description or Open Graph tags. No analytics or tracking scripts are present. Performance is moderate but could benefit from optimization. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. The site lacks modern accessibility features and security best practices.
Analyze Another Website