Skip to main content

Is anemoy.com a Scam? Security Check Results - anemoy.com Reviews

A

Is anemoy.com Safe? Security Analysis for 403 - FORBIDDEN

Check if anemoy.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQuery 3.3.1
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 4:59:45 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website at anemoy.com is currently inaccessible to the public, returning a 403 Forbidden error page indicating permission or access control issues. The domain is registered with Bluehost Inc. since 2019 and is valid until 2026, suggesting a legitimate registration but the website content is effectively blocked or restricted. No business, contact, or policy information is available on the accessible page, limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or services. Technically, the site uses jQuery 3.3.1 and is hosted on Bluehost, but lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for secure web presence. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, contact details, and analytics tools further indicates a minimal or misconfigured web presence. Overall, the site exhibits poor content quality, low technical maturity, and weak security posture, resulting in a low trust and credibility score.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.3.1

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of accessible content and business information, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain age and registrar are consistent with a small or personal website, but no details on market positioning, services, or partnerships are available. The absence of contact information and policies suggests the site is either under development, restricted, or abandoned. No evidence of revenue streams, target audience, or competitive advantages can be identified from the current data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak as the site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are essential for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The 403 Forbidden error indicates access control is active but may be misconfigured, potentially blocking legitimate users. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, and DNSSEC is not enabled, reducing DNS security. The site does not demonstrate compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations due to missing policies. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are necessary to ensure a secure and trustworthy web presence.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS redirects site-wide.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked due to permission issues. No specific WAF vendor branding detected.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.3.1
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:162.241.16.20 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(185 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.241.16.20
Name Servers:
ns1.bluehost.com
ns2.bluehost.com
MX Records:
0: mail.anemoy.com
SOA:Serial: 2020032408, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:63ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:162.241.16.20 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a minimal technology stack with jQuery 3.3.1 loaded from an external CDN. The hosting provider is Bluehost Inc., a reputable hosting company. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and does not show evidence of SEO or accessibility optimizations. Performance is moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to blocked content. The site is not mobile optimized and has poor navigation and design quality. Technical debt is evident from missing HTTPS and security best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, security headers, and a CMS or framework to improve maintainability and user experience.
Analyze Another Website