Skip to main content

Is angars.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Angars, SIA Reviews

angars.lv favicon

Is angars.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Angars, SIA

Check if angars.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressDivi ThemejQueryLeaflet (maps)WPForms+9 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:23:43 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Angars, SIA is a small Latvian company with a website currently under construction. The site provides basic contact information including a physical address in Riga, a phone number, and an email address. The business description is minimal, and no detailed services or market positioning are presented. The website uses WordPress with the Divi theme and several plugins, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, but SEO and accessibility features are limited. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the site appears legitimate but immature in content and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressDivi ThemejQueryLeaflet (maps)WPFormsDivi PixelDivi Mega ProSitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)Ivory SearchBreadcrumbs Divi ModuleDivi EssentialDivi PlusDiviFlashDiviGrid

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets a general audience in Latvia, but the business model and key services are not disclosed on the site. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests limited compliance maturity. No social media or partner domains are linked, indicating a standalone small business presence. The use of multiple Divi-related plugins suggests investment in website design and functionality, though the site is still in development. No certifications or trust indicators are visible, limiting business credibility signals.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@angars.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712927****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a positive security indicator. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The site does not appear to expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the provided data. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, security maturity is basic and could be improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Angars, SIA

Description:

Angars, SIA is a company located at Bākas iela 13, Ziemeļu rajons, Rīga, LV-1030, Latvia. The website indicates that a new site is under construction and provides contact details including phone and email.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressDivi ThemejQueryLeaflet (maps)WPFormsDivi PixelDivi Mega ProSitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)Ivory SearchBreadcrumbs Divi ModuleDivi EssentialDivi PlusDiviFlashDiviGrid
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Divi PixelWPFormsIvory Search
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is under construction with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.241 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.241
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: angars.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025060300, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:154ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.241 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several Divi-related plugins, indicating a modern but common CMS infrastructure. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain, with no external analytics or advertising scripts detected. Mobile optimization is good, but SEO is minimal with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations noted. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA labels on forms but no advanced accessibility enhancements. The site is currently under construction, limiting full technical assessment.
Analyze Another Website