Skip to main content

Is anime.com a Scam? Security Check Results - anime.com Reviews

anime.com favicon

Is anime.com Safe? Security Analysis for Anime.com | Your Source for Latest Anime Updates & News

Check if anime.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/amedium
ReactNext.jsApollo GraphQLGoogle Maps API
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:34:46 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Anime.com is a media-focused website providing detailed information about anime series, including cast lists, characters, staff credits, episode information, and real-time industry updates. The site targets anime fans and enthusiasts seeking comprehensive and up-to-date anime content. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, leveraging Apollo GraphQL for data management and Google Maps API for location services. The site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with a clean and consistent design. From a security perspective, the website lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, limiting the ability to report security issues or engage with the business formally. No adult or explicit content is present, making the site suitable for general audiences. Overall, Anime.com demonstrates a functional and modern web presence but requires significant improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and business transparency to enhance trustworthiness and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsApollo GraphQLGoogle Maps API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Anime.com operates as an information and news platform within the media industry, focusing on anime content. Its business model likely revolves around content aggregation and community engagement rather than direct sales. The site serves a niche audience of anime fans globally but lacks explicit business details such as company registration or contact information. The use of CDN services and modern frameworks suggests an investment in scalable infrastructure. However, the lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies may hinder partnerships and user trust. There is no evidence of monetization through advertising or affiliate programs in the provided content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. Key deficiencies include the absence of security headers, lack of privacy and cookie policies, no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, and missing contact information for security matters. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a significant red flag for legitimacy and accountability. While HTTPS is presumably enabled (inferred from external resource URLs), no explicit SSL/TLS configuration details are available. The site does not appear to use common security frameworks or certifications. These gaps expose the site to potential compliance issues and reduce user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and other privacy law compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Explore your favorite anime series in detail—full cast lists, characters, staff credits, and episode info—plus real-time updates from industry insiders so you never miss breaking news. Only on Anime.com.

Key Services:
anime series detailscast listscharacters informationstaff creditsepisode inforeal-time industry updates
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsApollo GraphQLGoogle Maps API
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default0
Selector:google0
Selector:k10
Selector:k20
Selector:selector10
Selector:selector20
Selector:mail0
Selector:email0
Selector:dkim0
Selector:s10
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:hello@azuki.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 36 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1920 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
anita.ns.cloudflare.com
cris.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382311754, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:60ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Anime.com uses a modern technology stack centered on React and Next.js frameworks, with Apollo GraphQL for data fetching and Google Maps API integration. The site is hosted on a CDN, likely providing good global performance and availability. The HTML structure and CSS usage indicate a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or backend platform disclosed. Performance appears moderate with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking, which is positive for privacy.
Analyze Another Website