Skip to main content

Is anoxinon.de a Scam? Security Check Results - Anoxinon e.V. Reviews

anoxinon.de favicon

Is anoxinon.de Safe? Security Analysis for Anoxinon e.V.

Check if anoxinon.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyGermanysmall
Hugo static site generatorBootstrap grid CSSFork Awesome iconsFont Awesome icons
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:00:14 AM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Anoxinon e.V. is a German non-profit organization dedicated to promoting data privacy and free software through the provision of information and alternative internet services. Their key offerings include a decentralized social network (Anoxinon Social), a blog focused on data security and free software (Anoxinon Media), and a privacy-friendly messaging service based on XMPP (Anoxinon Messenger). The organization targets privacy-conscious individuals and communities interested in open-source and decentralized technologies. The website is professionally designed using the Hugo static site generator and hosted on servercow infrastructure, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism and terms of service. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-positioned within its niche.

Detected Technologies

Hugo static site generatorBootstrap grid CSSFork Awesome iconsFont Awesome icons

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Anoxinon e.V. operates in the technology and non-profit sectors, focusing on privacy advocacy and free software promotion. Their business model revolves around community engagement and providing alternative internet services without reliance on commercial providers. The organization maintains a network of related domains offering complementary services such as social networking, file sharing, and voice communication. Their market position is niche but credible, supported by transparent WHOIS data and consistent branding. The absence of commercial advertising and tracking reflects their privacy-centric ethos. Growth potential lies in expanding community participation and enhancing service offerings. Partnerships appear internal or community-based rather than commercial.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with mandatory HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, reducing avenues for responsible vulnerability reporting. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose compliance risks under EU regulations. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit community site but could be improved to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Anoxinon e.V.

Description:

Wir fördern Datenschutz und freie Software durch bereitstellen von Informationen und alternativen Internetdiensten - und setzen uns damit für eine gemeinschaftliche digitale Welt ein.

Key Services:
Anoxinon Social - a decentralized social networkAnoxinon Media - blog on data security and free softwareAnoxinon Messenger - privacy-friendly XMPP chat service
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Hugo static site generatorBootstrap grid CSSFork Awesome iconsFont Awesome icons
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in HTML content

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

85/100
Score

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1360-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:postmaster+dmarc@anoxinon.de
Forensic Reports:postmaster+dmarc@anoxinon.de

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:anoxinon.de
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:10/16/2025 (39 days)
SANs:anoxinon.de, www.anoxinon.de

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:116.203.187.66
AAAA Records:2a01:4f8:c2c:6b0a::1
Name Servers:
angus.ns.servercow.de
dexter.ns.servercow.net
galloway.ns.servercow.com
MX Records:
10: mail.anoxinon.de
SOA:Serial: 2025090401, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:89ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator, leveraging Bootstrap grid and Fork Awesome for styling and icons. It is hosted on servercow infrastructure, as indicated by the nameservers. The site is mobile optimized with a responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. No client-side analytics or tracking scripts were detected, aligning with the privacy-focused mission. Performance is moderate, typical for static sites with moderate asset sizes. No CMS vulnerabilities are present due to static site architecture. Technical risks are minimal but could include lack of security headers and absence of automated security monitoring.
Analyze Another Website