Skip to main content

Is antirusa.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Antirusa.lv Reviews

antirusa.lv favicon

Is antirusa.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Antirusa.lv

Check if antirusa.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
Google AnalyticsYandex MetrikajQueryFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:08:04 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Antirusa.lv is a Latvian company specializing in industrial cleaning and protective services, primarily focusing on sandblasting, anti-corrosion treatment for trucks, and industrial/ fireproof painting. Positioned as a leading specialist in the Riga industrial zone, the company offers comprehensive maintenance and restoration services for heavy vehicles and industrial equipment, supported by a large infrastructure and mobile teams. The website reflects a professional business with clear service descriptions and contact information, targeting B2B clients in transportation and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website employs common analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika, uses Bootstrap for responsive design, and loads resources over HTTPS. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and no privacy or cookie policies, indicating gaps in compliance and security best practices. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the visible content, but improvements are needed in security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited WHOIS data reduce overall trustworthiness. The company provides clear contact details and social media presence, enhancing credibility. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and domain transparency to improve trust and security posture.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsYandex MetrikajQueryFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Antirusa.lv operates in the industrial maintenance and transportation sector, offering specialized services in anti-corrosion treatment, sandblasting, and industrial painting. The company targets commercial clients owning trucks and industrial equipment, leveraging a large physical facility and mobile teams to provide flexible service delivery. The presence of reputable partners such as Riga City Council and Latvijas Dzelzceļš indicates a solid partnership ecosystem. The business model is B2B service provision with a focus on quality and comprehensive solutions. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and infrastructure capable of handling large equipment. The website content and partner logos suggest a stable market position in Latvia's industrial service niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@antirusa.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712912****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed via headers. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No forms collecting sensitive data are present, reducing attack surface. Analytics tools are used without visible consent mechanisms, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, limiting transparency. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but requires improvements in headers, privacy policies, and compliance documentation to meet best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Antirusa.lv

Description:

Mūsu specializācija ir visu veidu smilšu strūklas, industriālās tīrīšanas un krāsošanas pakalpojumi. Uzņēmums piedāvā kravas automašīnu pretkorozijas apstrādi, smilšu strūklas apstrādi, industriālo un ugunsdrošības krāsošanu, kā arī mobilos darbus un pilnu aprīkojuma atjaunošanas ciklu.

Key Services:
Kravas automobiļu pretkorozijas apstrādeSmilšu strūklaIndustriālā/ugunsdrošības krāsošana
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsYandex MetrikajQueryFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsYandex Metrika
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Yandex Metrika
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:193.111.244.133
Name Servers:
ns1.trialine.lvDNS only
ns2.trialine.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.antirusa.lv
SOA:Serial: 2024013001, TTL: 14400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:318ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern responsive design framework (likely Bootstrap) and includes common web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika, with Google Tag Manager used for marketing management. The site loads resources asynchronously and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is basic with meta description present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, indicating technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Analyze Another Website