Skip to main content

Is apillon.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Domains By Proxy, LLC Reviews

apillon.io favicon

Is apillon.io Safe? Security Analysis for Domains By Proxy, LLC

Check if apillon.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
JavaScriptNuxt.jsTailwind CSSMailerLite
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:09:14 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Apillon.io is a technology startup platform focused on enabling faster launch and scalable development of Web3 applications by combining Web3 technologies with Web2 logic. The platform targets developers and businesses interested in blockchain and decentralized app development, offering embedded wallet solutions and blockchain integration services. The website is built using modern web technologies including Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates MailerLite for marketing automation. The site is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges, but lacks key compliance pages such as privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service. No contact information or security policies are published, which limits transparency and user trust. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2022 with privacy protection, which is common for startups but reduces registrant visibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain locks, but missing security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved compliance documentation and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptNuxt.jsTailwind CSSMailerLite

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Apillon operates in the emerging Web3 technology sector, positioning itself as a platform-as-a-service provider that simplifies Web3 app development and scaling. Its business model likely revolves around platform subscriptions or usage fees for blockchain integration and wallet embedding. The company targets a niche audience of Web3 developers and enterprises seeking to leverage blockchain technology without deep technical complexity. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is typical for startups protecting early-stage identity. The absence of contact details and compliance documentation suggests early-stage maturity or a focus on invite-only or developer community engagement. The integration with MailerLite indicates active marketing efforts. No partnerships or subsidiaries are publicly linked. The company is small and US-based, founded in 2022.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain status locks that prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, limiting transparency for security researchers. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided for security or abuse reporting. The use of MailerLite for marketing introduces third-party tracking but no extensive analytics or tracking services were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Domains By Proxy, LLC

Description:

The Apillon platform combines Web3 tech and Web2 logic for an easy and intuitive Web3 building.

Key Services:
Web3 app building platformEmbedded wallet solutionsBlockchain integration services
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptNuxt.jsTailwind CSSMailerLite
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Platforms:
AWS (inferred from AWS DNS servers)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
MailerLite
Marketing Tools:
MailerLite
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(373 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:3.164.68.109, 3.164.68.4, 3.164.68.37, 3.164.68.42
Name Servers:
ns-1305.awsdns-35.org
ns-1583.awsdns-05.co.uk
ns-429.awsdns-53.com
ns-912.awsdns-50.net
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:79ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) with Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary and maintainable front-end architecture. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure suggests reliable and scalable backend support. The site loads multiple preloaded scripts and stylesheets, with some prefetching to optimize performance. MailerLite integration supports marketing automation but no heavy analytics or tracking frameworks were detected, which is positive for privacy. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features appear basic and could be enhanced. No CMS was detected, implying a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website