Skip to main content

Is apold.cz a Scam? Security Check Results - APOLD SECURITY s.r.o. Reviews

apold.cz favicon

Is apold.cz Safe? Security Analysis for APOLD SECURITY s.r.o.

Check if apold.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherCzech Republicsmall
HTML5CSSJavaScript
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 11:56:42 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

APOLD SECURITY s.r.o. is a small regional security company based in the Czech Republic, founded in 1992. The company provides physical security, electronic security, cash and valuables transport, and related services primarily in the Plzeňský, Středočeský, Jihočeský regions and Prague. The website content reflects a business with a long-standing presence and a focus on personalized security services. Technically, the website is basic with standard HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS. There is no evidence of advanced analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies. Security posture is limited due to missing HTTPS verification and absence of security headers or policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from improved security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSSJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the security services sector with a focus on physical and electronic security solutions. Its market position is regional with a stable client base including construction firms, insurance companies, schools, and healthcare facilities. The business model centers on service provision with a personalized approach. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data. The lack of contact details and privacy policies online may limit customer trust and compliance with regulations. Growth opportunities could include digital transformation and enhanced online presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is basic and could be improved. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers is a concern. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The website does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities but lacks proactive security measures. The company should implement HTTPS, security headers, and publish privacy and security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and verify configuration.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

APOLD SECURITY s.r.o.

Description:

Firma APOLD byla založena Ivanem Šmídem v roce 1992 jako civilní bezpečnostní služba poskytující fyzickou ostrahu. V roce 2006 se transformovala na právnickou osobu APOLD SECURITY s.r.o., rozšířila nabídku služeb o elektronické zabezpečení a zlepšila kvalitu služeb díky novým technologiím a lidskému přístupu.

Key Services:
Fyzická ostrahaElektronické zabezpečeníProjektování a montáž EZPřeprava peněz a ceninVymáhání a správa pohledávek
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSSJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:217.16.176.7 include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:dkim(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:www.apold.cz
Issuer:R10
Valid Until:10/1/2025 (60 days)
SANs:apold.cz, www.apold.cz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
18 years(mature)

DNS Records

A Records:81.95.110.118
AAAA Records:2a02:4a8:ac24:111::110:118
Name Servers:
ns.pipni.cz
ns2.pipni.cz
ns3.pipni.cz
MX Records:
10: mail.apold.cz
20: ns2.tophosting.cz
SOA:Serial: 345160894, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:217.16.176.7 include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and CSS without detectable CMS or advanced frameworks. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are present. The site appears to be hosted on an unknown provider with no visible performance optimization or mobile-first design. The lack of modern technical features suggests potential technical debt and opportunities for modernization. Security configurations are minimal, and no automated tracking or marketing tools are detected.
Analyze Another Website