Skip to main content

Is app.link a Scam? Security Check Results - app.link Reviews

A

Is app.link Safe? Security Analysis for app.link

Check if app.link is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Branch.io CDN
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:29:06 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain app.link is registered since 2015 with a reputable registrar and uses Amazon AWS DNS servers, indicating a legitimate and stable technical foundation. However, the website content currently accessible is minimal, displaying only a 'link not found' error message with no additional business or security information. There are no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies present, nor any contact or incident response details. The technical infrastructure includes usage of Branch.io CDN resources, but lacks modern SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is moderate due to HTTPS presence but lacks security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the site appears to be either a placeholder or an error page rather than a fully functional business website.

Detected Technologies

Branch.io CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of substantive content, no clear business model, target audience, or market positioning can be determined from the website. The domain age and registrar information suggest a legitimate business entity, but no direct business intelligence such as company name, services, or partnerships is available from the site content. The absence of contact information and policies limits trust and credibility from a business perspective.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the limited content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Branch.io CDN
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and only shows a 'link not found' error message.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:appipv4.link
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M03
Valid Until:3/23/2026 (199 days)
SANs:appipv4.link, app.link, *.app.link +1 more

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(558 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.85.49.97, 52.85.49.59, 52.85.49.19, 52.85.49.57
AAAA Records:2600:9000:2038:cc00:19:9934:6a80:93a1, 2600:9000:2038:f600:19:9934:6a80:93a1, 2600:9000:2038:f200:19:9934:6a80:93a1, 2600:9000:2038:a600:19:9934:6a80:93a1, 2600:9000:2038:5800:19:9934:6a80:93a1, 2600:9000:2038:c00:19:9934:6a80:93a1, 2600:9000:2038:bc00:19:9934:6a80:93a1, 2600:9000:2038:5e00:19:9934:6a80:93a1
Name Servers:
ns-1521.awsdns-62.org
ns-1800.awsdns-33.co.uk
ns-249.awsdns-31.com
ns-615.awsdns-12.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website relies on Branch.io CDN for styles and Amazon AWS for DNS hosting, indicating use of modern cloud infrastructure. The HTML content is minimal and lacks meta tags, structured data, or SEO optimizations. No CMS or frameworks are detected. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic at best. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and could benefit from modernization and content enrichment.
Analyze Another Website