Skip to main content

Is appchina.com a Scam? Security Check Results - appchina.com Reviews

A

Is appchina.com Safe? Security Analysis for 400 The plain HTTP request was sent to HTTPS port

Check if appchina.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 3:45:16 AM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain appchina.com is registered since 2009 under Xin Net Technology Corporation, indicating a mature domain age. However, the website content is inaccessible, returning a 400 Bad Request error due to an HTTP request sent to an HTTPS port. This misconfiguration prevents any meaningful content or business information from being accessed or analyzed. Consequently, no metadata, contact information, privacy policies, or security policies are present on the site. The lack of accessible content severely limits the ability to assess the business model, market position, or technical infrastructure. Security posture is minimal, with no security headers detected and only basic SSL configuration implied by the HTTPS port usage. No WAF or security challenge mechanisms are detected, indicating the issue is a server misconfiguration rather than intentional blocking.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible website content, no business intelligence data such as company description, services, target audience, or market positioning can be derived. The domain's long registration history suggests it may have been operational previously or intended for a mature business, but current lack of content and contact information prevents further analysis. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or related domains are identified. The business sector and entity type remain unknown.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak given the lack of security headers and absence of privacy or cookie policies. The domain uses HTTPS, but the misconfiguration causing the HTTP request to HTTPS port error indicates potential server setup issues. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The WHOIS data shows no privacy protection, which is consistent with transparency but no further registrant details are available to verify legitimacy. Overall, the site lacks basic security best practices and compliance indicators.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Correct the server configuration to properly handle HTTP and HTTPS requests to ensure website accessibility.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to HTTP request sent to HTTPS port error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=0; preload"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'mail' uses 384-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.163.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:mail(384-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

85/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 22 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.appchina.com
Issuer:RapidSSL Global TLS RSA4096 SHA256 2022 CA1
Valid Until:8/26/2025 (22 days)
SANs:*.appchina.com, appchina.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

No MX Records

LOW

Domain cannot receive email without MX records

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:117.149.203.210, 220.185.184.94
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsv3.comDNS only
ns2.dnsv3.comDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:852ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal error page generated by nginx indicating a misconfiguration between HTTP and HTTPS ports. No metadata, scripts, or external resources are loaded. The domain uses name servers ns1.dnsv3.com and ns2.dnsv3.com but DNSSEC is not enabled. The lack of CMS or frameworks detected suggests either a bare server or a misconfigured hosting environment. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The technical debt is high as the site is non-functional in its current state, requiring immediate remediation to restore service.
Analyze Another Website