Skip to main content

Is appconsent.io a Scam? Security Check Results - SFBX Reviews

appconsent.io favicon

Is appconsent.io Safe? Security Analysis for SFBX

Check if appconsent.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesmedium
WordPressElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Consent Mode v2Private Blockchain (Chainsaw)+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:58:55 AM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SFBX is a technology company specializing in consent management solutions through its AppConsent® platform, which is certified by Google and integrates with Google Consent Mode v2. The company targets businesses needing GDPR and e-privacy compliance, including SMEs and large enterprises, and has a strong market presence with over 14,000 clients including major brands. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern web technologies, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain protections, though some security headers and DNSSEC are missing. Privacy compliance is partial due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies on the main site. Overall, the company demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Consent Mode v2Private Blockchain (Chainsaw)jQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SFBX operates in the technology sector, offering a SaaS consent management platform that leverages blockchain technology for secure consent data storage. Its business model focuses on subscription plans catering to different business sizes. The company benefits from certifications and participation in industry associations, enhancing its credibility. Its client base includes notable enterprises, indicating strong market positioning. The company emphasizes privacy by design and environmental considerations in its product development. The ecosystem includes related domains for documentation and application access, supporting a comprehensive service offering.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@sfbx.io

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and domain status protections to secure its online presence. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended for enhanced security. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available, which could impact trust and readiness. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking, balanced with privacy compliance efforts. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by publishing security policies and implementing additional technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SFBX

Description:

SFBX offers a consent management platform (CMP) called AppConsent® that helps optimize consent rates and ensure a respectful, personalized user experience. The platform is certified by Google and integrates with Google Consent Mode v2. It focuses on GDPR and e-privacy compliance, leveraging a private blockchain for secure and immutable consent data storage.

Key Services:
Consent management platform (AppConsent®)Compliance with GDPR and e-privacyPrivate blockchain for consent data securityIntegration with Google Consent Mode v2
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Consent Mode v2Private Blockchain (Chainsaw)jQuery
Frameworks:
Yoast SEO
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on consent management.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

80/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:185.181.157.64 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 84 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1419 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:35.240.88.119
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:97ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:185.181.157.64 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mandrillapp.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and SEO-friendly infrastructure. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and supports Google Consent Mode v2 for consent management. Hosting appears to leverage Google Cloud DNS services. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses jQuery and various Elementor and plugin CSS/JS assets. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by improving security headers and DNS configurations.
Analyze Another Website