Skip to main content

Is apps2.me a Scam? Security Check Results - Apps2me Reviews

apps2.me favicon

Is apps2.me Safe? Security Analysis for Apps2me

Check if apps2.me is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIcelandsmall
jQuery 3.7.0JavaScript ES ModulesCSSHTML5
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 10:39:51 PM
55
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Apps2me is a newly launched technology platform specializing in hosting and providing access to Telegram mini apps, positioning itself as a niche application store with enhanced features. The website presents a basic but functional design with clear navigation and mobile optimization, targeting general users interested in Telegram mini apps. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including jQuery and ES modules, hosted via Spaceship, Inc., with a domain registered recently in December 2024 and protected by privacy services. Security posture is moderate with notable gaps such as lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers, and absence of published privacy or security policies. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the platform appears legitimate but early-stage, requiring improvements in security and compliance to enhance credibility and user trust.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.0JavaScript ES ModulesCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on the emerging market of Telegram mini apps. Its business model revolves around providing a centralized platform for discovering and adding mini apps, potentially monetizing through app promotion or integration. The company is small and newly founded, with no visible parent or subsidiary relationships. Market positioning is niche with limited direct competition. The lack of detailed business information and contact data suggests an early development phase. Growth potential depends on expanding app offerings and establishing trust through improved transparency and security practices.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is currently low to moderate. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers exposes the platform to DNS spoofing and common web attacks. The domain is privacy protected, which is reasonable for a startup but reduces transparency. No privacy or security policies are published, and no incident response contacts are available, indicating gaps in compliance and readiness. The platform uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URL) but SSL configuration details are unknown. No vulnerable libraries were detected, but the use of jQuery requires monitoring for updates. Overall, the security posture requires enhancement to meet industry best practices and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC and implement comprehensive DNS security measures.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Apps2me

Description:

Apps2 is the new era of applications store, mini apps with big feauteres. Telegram mini apps with big features.

Key Services:
Telegram mini apps hosting and discovery
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.0JavaScript ES ModulesCSSHTML5
Platforms:
Telegram mini apps platform (implied)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a new platform focused on Telegram mini apps.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 54 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(113 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:91.132.224.250
Name Servers:
launch1.spaceship.net
launch2.spaceship.net
SOA:Serial: 1735581813, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:214ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern front-end stack with jQuery fallback and ES modules for JavaScript, supported by CSS and HTML5. Hosting is provided by Spaceship, Inc., with domain registration recent and privacy protected. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the absence of a CMS or backend details limits assessment of scalability and maintainability. No analytics or advertising scripts are present, indicating minimal tracking. Technical debt appears low but security and compliance gaps present risks to operational stability and user trust.
Analyze Another Website