Skip to main content

Is arbitrum.foundation a Scam? Security Check Results - Arbitrum Foundation Reviews

arbitrum.foundation favicon

Is arbitrum.foundation Safe? Security Analysis for Arbitrum Foundation

Check if arbitrum.foundation is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSJavaScriptFlickity carousel
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 12:49:16 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Arbitrum Foundation is a technology-focused non-profit entity dedicated to the development and governance of Arbitrum, a suite of Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solutions. Positioned as a key player in the blockchain ecosystem, the foundation supports ecosystem growth through governance, grants, and community engagement. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging Next.js and React technologies, with strong mobile optimization and good SEO practices. Social media integration with platforms like Discord, X, and Farcaster enhances community interaction. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, suitable for its target audience of developers and blockchain enthusiasts.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSJavaScriptFlickity carousel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Arbitrum Foundation operates in the blockchain technology sector, focusing on Ethereum scalability and governance. Its business model centers on ecosystem support rather than direct commercial sales, relying on grants and community-driven governance. The foundation's market position is strong within the Layer 2 scaling niche, benefiting from partnerships and an active community. Revenue streams are likely grant-based and possibly donations or sponsorships. The target audience includes developers, DAO members, and blockchain users. The foundation's digital presence is modern and professional, indicating a mature operational approach. Partnerships with ecosystem portals and documentation sites reinforce its strategic positioning.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protections are in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Arbitrum Foundation

Description:

The Arbitrum Foundation empowers the development and governance of Arbitrum technology and helps foster growth and success within the ecosystem.

Key Services:
Governance of Arbitrum technologyEcosystem growth supportGrant programsCommunity engagement
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsCloudflare DNSJavaScriptFlickity carousel
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@arbitrum.foundation

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(372 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
gracie.ns.cloudflare.com
louis.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382596616, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:97ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and DNS security benefits. The site uses JavaScript libraries such as Flickity for UI components. SEO and accessibility are well addressed with proper meta tags and responsive design. No CMS is detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is fast with deferred script loading and prefetching. Technical risks are minimal but could include lack of security headers and absence of DNSSEC. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and well-implemented.
Analyze Another Website