Skip to main content

Is arche.capital a Scam? Security Check Results - Arche Capital Reviews

arche.capital favicon

Is arche.capital Safe? Security Analysis for Arche Capital

Check if arche.capital is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
JavaScriptReact (implied by JSX and module script)Vercel hosting (implied by vercel.app image URL)Modern CSS
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 2:38:17 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Arche Capital is an early-stage venture capital firm specializing in investments at the intersection of financial services, blockchain technology, and artificial intelligence. The firm positions itself as a thesis-driven, long-term investor focusing on the emerging Web3 ecosystem and the transformation of global finance through permissionless, open financial infrastructure. Their website highlights a portfolio of companies across infrastructure, zero-knowledge proofs, fintech, decentralized AI, and liquid markets, supported by a team with strong backgrounds in finance, technology, and venture capital. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies, likely React, and hosted on a performant platform such as Vercel. The site is mobile optimized, well-structured, and provides a professional user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. However, there is a lack of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for VC firms, but limits transparency about domain ownership. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and security headers. The overall risk assessment is low to moderate. The firm appears legitimate and professional, but improvements in privacy compliance, security transparency, and contact information would enhance trust and reduce potential risks. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, providing clear contact channels for security incidents, and enhancing accessibility features.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptReact (implied by JSX and module script)Vercel hosting (implied by vercel.app image URL)Modern CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Arche Capital operates in the competitive venture capital market focusing on Web3, blockchain, AI, and fintech sectors. Their business model centers on early-stage investments in startups and protocols that align with their thesis on the future of global finance. The firm leverages the expertise of its managing partners, who have strong industry backgrounds and networks, to identify promising opportunities. The portfolio is diversified across multiple sub-sectors within the blockchain and AI space, indicating a broad investment strategy. The lack of public company registration details and limited contact information suggests a lean operational structure typical of boutique VC firms. The firm’s market positioning as a long-term, thesis-driven investor differentiates it from opportunistic or short-term focused funds. Growth indicators include a well-curated portfolio and experienced team, but public-facing transparency could be improved to attract broader investor confidence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance gap under GDPR and similar regulations. The lack of incident response or abuse contact information limits the firm's readiness to handle security incidents transparently. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security culture appears nascent, with room for improvement in policy transparency and technical hardening. Implementing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program would enhance trust and preparedness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Arche Capital

Description:

Early stage Web3 VC focusing on the convergence of financial services, blockchain and AI

Key Services:
Early stage venture capital fundingInvestment in blockchain protocolsSupport for AI and fintech startups
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptReact (implied by JSX and module script)Vercel hosting (implied by vercel.app image URL)Modern CSS
Frameworks:
React
Platforms:
Vercel
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS implied by URL scheme
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:arche.capital
Issuer:R13
Valid Until:11/22/2025 (76 days)
SANs:arche.capital

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.199.111.153, 185.199.108.153, 185.199.109.153, 185.199.110.153
AAAA Records:2606:50c0:8002::153, 2606:50c0:8001::153, 2606:50c0:8003::153, 2606:50c0:8000::153
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.comDNS only
dns2.registrar-servers.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1696618052, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:110ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with modern front-end technologies, likely React, and uses a modular JavaScript approach. Hosting appears to be on Vercel, providing fast and reliable delivery. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with semantic HTML elements. Performance is likely fast given the minimal external dependencies and optimized assets. However, there is no evidence of a CMS or backend platform from the HTML content. The site lacks advanced SEO structured data such as JSON-LD, which could improve search visibility. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve SEO, accessibility, and security configurations to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website