Skip to main content

Is archiefweb.eu a Scam? Security Check Results - www.archiefweb.eu Reviews

archiefweb.eu favicon

Is archiefweb.eu Safe? Security Analysis for www.archiefweb.eu

Check if archiefweb.eu is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentNetherlandssmall
WordPress 6.7.2jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1SiteOrigin Panels pluginSpacious WordPress theme+3 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 7:00:51 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

www.archiefweb.eu is a specialized web archiving service focused primarily on Dutch governmental organizations and public institutions. The website offers archiving solutions compliant with the Dutch Archiefwet 1995 and other compliance regulations, including archiving of social media content. Their services include storing archives in the ISO-certified WARC format with digital signatures to guarantee authenticity. The site targets a niche market within the Dutch public sector and related organizations, providing tools such as search and calendar functions to navigate archived content. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern theme and plugins, including jQuery and SiteOrigin Panels. The site is served over HTTPS with no visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks visible security headers and privacy-related pages, which could be improved to enhance compliance and trust. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and no detected vulnerabilities in the frontend code. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as contact information for incident response, represents gaps in compliance and security transparency. The WHOIS data is not publicly available due to EURid privacy policies for .eu domains, which is standard and justified for this domain type. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and focused on a clear business niche. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency would enhance trust and security posture.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.7.2jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1SiteOrigin Panels pluginSpacious WordPress themeFont Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Lato)WARC format for archiving

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the government and non-profit sectors, providing essential archiving services for compliance and preservation. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialization in Dutch public sector archiving and use of internationally recognized standards like ISO WARC. The business model is service-based, targeting governmental bodies, universities, banks, and insurance companies requiring compliant archiving solutions. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized organization with a focused market presence. There is no indication of parent companies or subsidiaries. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests room for growth in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The company’s partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website, and no related domains or partners were identified.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible frontend vulnerabilities. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness for security events. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, which could improve security culture and external reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small government-focused service but would benefit from enhancements in policy transparency and technical security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

www.archiefweb.eu

Description:

Website archivering en social media; archivering van websites en social media, met focus op Nederlandse overheidsorganisaties en andere instellingen. Biedt webarchieven en archivering volgens Archiefwet 1995 en compliancy regels.

Key Services:
Web archiving for government and public organizationsSocial media archivingArchiving in ISO-certified WARC formatDigital signature for archive authenticitySearch and calendar functions for archived content
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.7.2jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1SiteOrigin Panels pluginSpacious WordPress themeFont Awesome 4.7.0Google Fonts (Lato)WARC format for archiving
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
  • No forms detected to assess input security

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

65/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:shared13.easyhosting.nl include:_spf.google.com include:spf.spamx.denit.net include:_spf.transip.email include:146030695.spf08.hubspotemail.net ~all
DNS Lookups:5/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:reject@archiefweb.eu
Forensic Reports:reject@archiefweb.eu

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

17 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:83.217.70.12
Name Servers:
igor.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
meera.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382459802, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:60ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:shared13.easyhosting.nl include:_spf.google.com include:spf.spamx.denit.net include:_spf.transip.email include:146030695.spf08.hubspotemail.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using version 6.7.2 with common plugins such as SiteOrigin Panels and a well-maintained Spacious theme. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Font Awesome 4.7.0 for UI elements. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and WordPress core servers. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimization indicators but no major issues detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by The SEO Framework plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format describing the website and organization. Accessibility is basic with some screen-reader text elements. The technical stack is standard for small to medium WordPress sites, with opportunities to improve security headers and privacy compliance.
Analyze Another Website