Is archives.gov Safe? Security Analysis for National Archives and Records Administration
Check if archives.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) is the official U.S. government agency responsible for preserving and providing access to federal records and historical documents. The website serves a broad audience including researchers, veterans, educators, and the general public, offering access to military records, educational resources, and presidential libraries. It holds a strong market position as the authoritative archival institution in the United States. Technically, the website is built on the Drupal CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure suitable for a large government entity. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs standard security headers, with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms and published security or incident response policies, which are areas for improvement to enhance compliance and transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and content-rich, with a high legitimacy score based on domain registration and business consistency. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy consent tools, publishing security policies, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen the security posture and privacy compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
NARA operates as a government agency with a clear mandate to preserve U.S. federal records. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on archival access and educational outreach rather than commercial revenue. The agency maintains partnerships with presidential libraries and archival foundations, enhancing its ecosystem. The website's extensive content and multiple service offerings indicate a large-scale operation with enterprise-level resources. The target customer segments include government employees, veterans, researchers, educators, and the general public. The presence of multiple trusted partner domains and official social media channels supports a robust partnership ecosystem and strong market presence.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Phone Numbers (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information. The integration of Google Tag Manager and analytics is managed securely. However, the absence of a visible cookie consent mechanism and lack of published security or incident response policies represent compliance gaps, particularly regarding privacy regulations like GDPR. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the security culture appears solid but could be enhanced with better privacy and incident response disclosures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
National Archives and Records Administration
The National Archives and Records Administration preserves and provides access to the records of the U.S. government, including documents, photos, and historical records.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading
- No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Official U.S. government archival website with comprehensive content.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 79 days
Mixed Content Detected
MEDIUM2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
Unregistered MX Record
HIGHMX record points to unregistered domain: us.etp.fireeyegov.com
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
Potential Subdomain Takeover
HIGHSubdomain dev.archives.gov points to unregistered service archives-gov-dev-publicelb-197081278.us-east-1.elb.amazonaws.com
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings