Skip to main content

Is archivesfoundation.org a Scam? Security Check Results - National Archives Foundation Reviews

archivesfoundation.org favicon

Is archivesfoundation.org Safe? Security Analysis for National Archives Foundation

Check if archivesfoundation.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitUnited Statesmedium
WordPressNitroPack optimizationGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryFont Awesome+2 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 3:36:24 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The National Archives Foundation website serves as the official nonprofit partner to the U.S. National Archives, focusing on generating financial and creative support for exhibits, programs, and educational initiatives. The site targets a broad audience including educators, families, and visitors interested in America's historical records. The business model is nonprofit, emphasizing partnership and support rather than commercial transactions. The organization is well-established with a domain age consistent with its founding year of 2013 and operates primarily within the U.S. market.

Detected Technologies

WordPressNitroPack optimizationGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts (Montserrat, Avenir)Tidio Chat

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Foundation holds a strong market position as the official nonprofit partner of the National Archives, leveraging its brand and partnerships to support cultural heritage initiatives. Its key services include fundraising, program development, and educational outreach. The website reflects a medium-sized nonprofit with consistent branding and a clear mission. The presence of social media channels and marketing tools like HubSpot indicates active engagement with its audience and stakeholders. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer protection, indicating a solid baseline security posture. The use of reputable hosting (DreamHost) and optimization tools (NitroPack) supports performance and security. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies limits the site's readiness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional best practices and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

National Archives Foundation

Description:

Connecting you to America’s story. As the National Archives’ nonprofit partner, the Foundation generates financial and creative support for exhibits, programs & educational initiatives

Key Services:
Financial support for exhibitsProgram developmentEducational initiatives
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressNitroPack optimizationGoogle Tag ManagerjQueryFont AwesomeGoogle Fonts (Montserrat, Avenir)Tidio Chat
Frameworks:
Astra WordPress Theme
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerHubSpot
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot (hs-scripts.com)
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotTidio Chat
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professionally designed nonprofit site supporting the US National Archives.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:241972057.spf04.hubspotemail.net include:sendgrid.net include:mailgun.org ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@archivesfoundation.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 83 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:archivesfoundation.org
Issuer:E8
Valid Until:11/28/2025 (83 days)
SANs:archivesfoundation.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
12 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(288 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.134.65, 104.21.25.131
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3036::6815:1983, 2606:4700:3037::ac43:8641
Name Servers:
kiki.ns.cloudflare.com
nero.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
20: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
20: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
30: ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
30: ASPMX3.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
30: ASPMX4.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
30: ASPMX5.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
SOA:Serial: 2382432428, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:84ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:241972057.spf04.hubspotemail.net include:sendgrid.net include:mailgun.org ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Astra theme, enhanced with NitroPack for performance optimization. It employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and Tidio Chat for analytics and user engagement. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and fast loading times. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting is provided by DreamHost, a reputable provider. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, though improvements in security headers and compliance documentation are recommended.
Analyze Another Website