Skip to main content

Is arenasushi.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - arenasushi.lv Reviews

arenasushi.lv favicon

Is arenasushi.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Arenasushi

Check if arenasushi.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
jQueryjQuery UIMaterialize CSSGoogle Maps APIGoogle Analytics+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:35:23 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Arenasushi.lv is a Latvian sushi restaurant offering a broad menu of sushi products including various types of maki, uramaki, tempura, and sushi sets, with an online ordering and delivery service targeting local customers in Riga. The website is professionally designed with good navigation and mobile optimization, leveraging modern web technologies such as Materialize CSS, jQuery, Google Maps API, and integrates advertising and analytics tools like Google Adsense, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure, though security headers and incident response information are absent. Privacy compliance is basic but present, with a cookie consent mechanism and linked privacy and terms of service pages. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate and privacy protection is likely justified for this business type. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and functional online presence for a small hospitality business.

Detected Technologies

jQueryjQuery UIMaterialize CSSGoogle Maps APIGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle Adsense

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the hospitality sector, focusing on sushi retail and delivery in Latvia. It targets general consumers seeking sushi meals with a convenient online ordering model. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized local business with no evident parent or subsidiary companies. The presence of privacy and cookie policies, contact details, and a comprehensive menu supports credibility. The use of common third-party marketing and analytics tools suggests an intent to engage customers and optimize marketing efforts. No advanced certifications or security policies are disclosed, which is typical for small hospitality businesses. The business model relies on direct sales and delivery, with a clear local market focus.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@proton.me

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712626****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses standard security practices such as cookie consent. However, it lacks advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy and does not provide a dedicated security policy or incident response contact. The inclusion of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface, necessitating regular review for vulnerabilities. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is moderate, reflecting a basic but functional security posture suitable for a small business. Enhancements in security headers and incident response transparency would improve the security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Arenasushi is a sushi restaurant and delivery service based in Riga, Latvia, offering a wide variety of sushi products including maki, uramaki, tempura, and sushi sets.

Key Services:
Sushi diningOnline orderingFood delivery
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryjQuery UIMaterialize CSSGoogle Maps APIGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle Adsense
Frameworks:
Materialize
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a local sushi restaurant with online ordering and delivery

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:37.27.130.62 ~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:37.27.130.62
Name Servers:
ns1.itt.lvDNS only
ns2.itt.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.arenasushi.lv

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with Materialize CSS framework and jQuery libraries, integrating Google Maps API for location services. It loads asynchronously Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure with a sidebar menu and mobile-friendly sidenav. Performance is moderate, with some external scripts that may impact load times. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic HTML. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and title tags but lacks Open Graph or structured data markup. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from SEO and accessibility enhancements.
Analyze Another Website