Skip to main content

Is argument.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Argument Computer Corporation Reviews

argument.xyz favicon

Is argument.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Argument Computer Corporation

Check if argument.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Astro v4.14.3SVG graphicsCSS with Tailwind-like utility classesJavaScript modules
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:53:22 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Argument Computer Corporation is a technology company specializing in accelerating verifiable computing through advanced cryptographic and formal verification technologies. Their offerings include open-source projects such as Lurk, Yatima, Sphinx, and zero-knowledge light clients, targeting developers and enterprises in blockchain and cryptography sectors. The company positions itself as an innovator in scalable, private, decentralized software solutions. Technically, the website is built using the Astro framework, hosted on Netlify, and demonstrates excellent design, mobile optimization, and performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks explicit security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Contact information is limited to an email address. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Astro v4.14.3SVG graphicsCSS with Tailwind-like utility classesJavaScript modules

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in a niche technology sector focused on zero-knowledge proofs and verifiable computing, leveraging open-source software to engage the developer community. Their business model appears to be technology development and community-driven innovation rather than direct sales. The presence of GitHub repositories and clear mission statements indicate transparency and a focus on technical excellence. The lack of physical address or phone contact suggests a lean, possibly startup or small enterprise structure. The company has maintained domain registration since 2014, consistent with its founding timeline, supporting credibility. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@argument.xyz

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer locks, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. No forms are present to analyze for secure input handling. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, impacting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and technical security controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Argument Computer Corporation

Description:

Argument Computer Corporation accelerates verifiable computing by combining zero-knowledge cryptography, formal verification, and distributed consensus technologies to build unbreakable, scalable, private, decentralized software.

Key Services:
Lurk zero-knowledge reduction-machineYatima certifying compilerSphinx zero-knowledge virtual machineZero-knowledge light clients for blockchain interoperability
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Astro v4.14.3SVG graphicsCSS with Tailwind-like utility classesJavaScript modules
Frameworks:
Astro
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URL)
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional technology company site focused on verifiable computing.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:security@argument.xyz

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(268 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:75.2.60.5, 99.83.231.61
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1740599488, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:110ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses the Astro framework version 4.14.3, indicating a modern static site generation approach. It employs SVG graphics and CSS with utility classes resembling Tailwind CSS for styling. Hosting is provided by Netlify, which offers good performance and scalability. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with semantic HTML and ARIA roles implied by structure. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating a privacy-conscious design. The site loads quickly and has proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing. Technical debt appears low, but security enhancements are recommended.
Analyze Another Website