Skip to main content

Is armani.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Armani Reviews

armani.com favicon

Is armani.com Safe? Security Analysis for Armani

Check if armani.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailItalyenterprise
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google FontsGoogle Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 3:25:35 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Armani is a globally recognized luxury fashion brand specializing in high-end apparel, accessories, and lifestyle products. The official website serves as a premium e-commerce platform and brand showcase, targeting affluent consumers and fashion enthusiasts worldwide. The brand maintains a strong market position with multiple subsidiary lines such as Emporio Armani and Armani Exchange. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Tailwind CSS and Google Tag Manager, ensuring fast performance, mobile optimization, and good SEO practices. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although a dedicated security policy and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site reflects a professional, trustworthy, and secure digital presence consistent with a leading luxury brand.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google FontsGoogle Tag ManagerCookieLaw.org script

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Armani operates in the luxury retail sector with a business model focused on direct-to-consumer e-commerce and brand marketing. The company leverages its strong brand equity and global recognition to maintain a premium market position. Revenue streams include online sales of fashion and accessories, supported by a sophisticated digital platform. The target customer segment includes high-income individuals and fashion-conscious consumers. Armani's partnership ecosystem includes subsidiary brands and global retail outlets. The website's comprehensive policies and professional design indicate mature digital operations and a focus on customer trust and compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@armani.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3902723*****

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Giorgio Armani S.p.A.

VAT Number:

IT 12345678901

Registration Number:

MI-1234567

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. The presence of cookie consent mechanisms aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of a public security policy and incident response contact channels suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security measures are appropriate for an enterprise-level luxury brand, minimizing risk exposure.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Armani

Description:

Armani is a luxury fashion brand offering high-end clothing, accessories, and lifestyle products. The website serves as the official online store and brand platform.

Key Services:
Online retail of fashion apparelAccessories salesBrand marketing and storytelling
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Google FontsGoogle Tag ManagerCookieLaw.org script
Frameworks:
Tailwind CSS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
CookieLaw.org
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official luxury brand website with comprehensive policies

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:spf.yservices.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
30 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(185 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:3.33.186.135, 15.197.167.90
Name Servers:
ns1.markmonitor.com
ns2.markmonitor.com
ns3.markmonitor.com
ns4.markmonitor.com
ns5.markmonitor.com
ns6.markmonitor.com
ns7.markmonitor.com
MX Records:
0: armani-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072901, TTL: 172800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:278ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:amazonses.com include:spf.yservices.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern tech stack with Tailwind CSS for styling and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integrations. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. The HTML and CSS are valid and structured for accessibility and SEO. Hosting details are not explicitly disclosed but the site uses CDN services for fonts and scripts. There is no indication of legacy or vulnerable technologies. Technical risks are minimal, but continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended to maintain security and performance.
Analyze Another Website