Skip to main content

Is arringtoncapital.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Arrington Capital Reviews

arringtoncapital.com favicon

Is arringtoncapital.com Safe? Security Analysis for Arrington Capital

Check if arringtoncapital.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
jQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsYoast SEO
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:19:19 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Arrington Capital is a specialized investment firm focused on digital assets and Web3 technologies, operating since 2017 with a portfolio exceeding 200 early-stage crypto companies. The firm targets crypto entrepreneurs and investors, providing capital and strategic support to foster innovation in the blockchain ecosystem. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, leveraging modern web technologies and SEO tools to maintain digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with integrations such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy, although the website content and business model appear credible and well-established. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly presented, indicating room for compliance improvement. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Detected Technologies

jQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsYoast SEO

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Arrington Capital holds a strong position in the niche market of crypto and Web3 venture investments, leveraging a crypto-native team to back early-stage startups. Their business model centers on thesis-driven investments, emphasizing collaboration and support for founders. The firm’s digital presence is well-maintained, targeting a specialized audience of crypto investors and entrepreneurs. While the website lacks detailed corporate disclosures such as physical addresses or phone contacts, the presence of professional branding and a sizable portfolio suggests a medium-sized enterprise with a focused market approach. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies may impact trust among cautious investors or partners. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@arringtoncapital.com
c*****@arringtoncapital.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable analytics tools, indicating baseline security hygiene. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options) and lack of published security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerable libraries, but the missing WHOIS data and lack of privacy/cookie policies represent compliance gaps. Incident response readiness and data protection officer contacts are not found, suggesting limited public security governance documentation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better policy publication and header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Arrington Capital

Description:

Arrington Capital is a thesis-driven firm dedicated to investing in digital assets and Web3. Since 2017, they have invested in over 200 early-stage companies within the crypto ecosystem. The team consists of seasoned entrepreneurs, founders, and executives committed to supporting founders in the space.

Key Services:
Early-stage investmentPortfolio supportCollaboration with founders
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsYoast SEO
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 57 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
7 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(79 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:159.223.169.250
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site loads CSS and JavaScript resources efficiently, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile responsiveness. SEO is enhanced by the Yoast SEO plugin, with proper meta tags and structured JSON-LD data describing the organization and webpage. Accessibility is basic but functional. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided HTML content. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced technical security configurations such as HTTP security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence but has opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website