Skip to main content

Is artisuljanovs.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Artis Uljanovs Reviews

artisuljanovs.com favicon

Is artisuljanovs.com Safe? Security Analysis for Artis Uljanovs

Check if artisuljanovs.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1Open Sans fontMaintenance plugin CSS and JS
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:12:35 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.artisuljanovs.com is currently in maintenance mode, displaying a placeholder page with minimal content and no active business information. The site appears to be built on WordPress, utilizing standard plugins and jQuery libraries, but lacks any visible contact, privacy, or legal information. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and registration status. Technically, the site uses HTTPS and standard web technologies but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The login form is present but does not show anti-CSRF protections. Overall, the website's security posture is basic, with room for significant improvements in security best practices and compliance. The lack of business information and policies reduces trustworthiness and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1Open Sans fontMaintenance plugin CSS and JS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the maintenance mode and lack of content, no clear business model, market positioning, or target audience can be identified. The site appears to represent an individual or small entity named Artis Uljanovs, but no further business details or services are provided. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or contact channels. The domain's registration status is unclear, which may impact business credibility and customer trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a positive security indicator. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS are detected, and the login form lacks visible anti-CSRF tokens. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trust. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires enhancements to meet modern security standards and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is available and accurate to improve legitimacy.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Artis Uljanovs

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1Open Sans fontMaintenance plugin CSS and JS
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URLs (https://)
  • Login form uses POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently in maintenance mode with minimal content

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:199.192.22.200 ip4:162.0.217.70 ip4:162.0.217.72 include:spf.web-hosting.com +a +mx ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(359 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:199.192.22.200
Name Servers:
ns1.artisuljanovs.com
ns2.artisuljanovs.com
MX Records:
0: mail.artisuljanovs.com
20: mx3-hosting.jellyfish.systems
10: mx2-hosting.jellyfish.systems

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:199.192.22.200 ip4:162.0.217.70 ip4:162.0.217.72 include:spf.web-hosting.com +a +mx ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with standard plugins and uses jQuery 3.7.1 and jQuery Migrate 3.4.1. The site loads Open Sans fonts from an external CDN. The maintenance page uses custom CSS and JS from a maintenance plugin. Performance appears moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of content and metadata. The site lacks advanced technical configurations such as security headers and structured data markup. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website