Skip to main content

Is arts.gov a Scam? Security Check Results - National Endowment for the Arts Reviews

arts.gov favicon

Is arts.gov Safe? Security Analysis for National Endowment for the Arts

Check if arts.gov is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Stateslarge
Drupal 10Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsModernizr
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 9:15:21 AM
69
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is an independent federal agency dedicated to funding, promoting, and strengthening the creative capacity of communities across the United States. The website serves as a comprehensive portal for information on grants, initiatives, news, and impact related to arts and culture. It targets a broad audience including artists, nonprofit organizations, educators, policymakers, and the general public interested in arts participation and cultural development. The NEA holds a strong market position as a government entity with nationwide influence and a long history since its founding in 1965. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 CMS and incorporates modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although some improvements could be made in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Performance is moderate with a professional and consistent design that enhances user experience. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks certain security headers and a formal vulnerability disclosure policy, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. The WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, which is typical for government .gov domains, and does not raise legitimacy concerns given the official nature of the site. Overall, the NEA website is a trustworthy, well-maintained government resource with excellent content quality and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding cookie consent for privacy compliance, and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to further strengthen security and trust.

Detected Technologies

Drupal 10Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsModernizr

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The NEA operates as a government agency providing grants and support to arts organizations and individuals nationwide. Its competitive advantage lies in its federal backing, extensive grant programs, and authoritative role in arts policy and research. Revenue streams are primarily government appropriations, with no commercial sales. The target customers include nonprofit arts organizations, artists, educators, and the general public. Growth indicators include ongoing grant awards, new initiatives, and active public engagement through stories and social media. The agency maintains partnerships with state arts agencies and cultural institutions. Operationally, the NEA emphasizes transparency, accessibility, and impact measurement, positioning itself as a key player in the U.S. arts ecosystem.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

202*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive information. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a moderate gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and vulnerability disclosure policy indicates areas for compliance and transparency improvement. No known vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected. Incident response contact information is not prominently provided, which could delay reporting and mitigation of security incidents. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from adopting additional best practices to enhance defense-in-depth and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

National Endowment for the Arts

Description:

The National Endowment for the Arts is an independent federal agency that funds, promotes, and strengthens the creative capacity of communities by providing all Americans with diverse opportunities for arts participation.

Key Services:
Grant awards to nonprofit organizations and artistsArts education partnershipsResearch and impact studiesPublic engagement and storytellingHonors and awards programs
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Drupal 10Google Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsModernizr
Frameworks:
Drupal CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

excellent

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerUniversal Federated Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Universal-Federated-Analytics-Min.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Official U.S. government website for the National Endowment for the Arts

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net include:spf.constantcontact.com ip4:12.14.15.218 ip4:207.159.110.197 ip4:204.144.124.70 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:reports@dmarc.cyber.dhs.gov

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
25 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(213 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:3.212.25.176
Name Servers:
25munaguwq.cloudflare-gateway.comWHOIS only
sauthns1.qwest.netDNS only
sauthns2.qwest.net
MX Records:
0: arts-gov.mail.eo.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2250709121, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:361ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:sendgrid.net include:spf.constantcontact.com ip4:12.14.15.218 ip4:207.159.110.197 ip4:204.144.124.70 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The NEA website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS platform, ensuring a robust content management infrastructure. The use of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics indicates a mature approach to analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, adhering to best practices for inclusive design. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and resource management. The absence of certain security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests some technical debt in security and privacy compliance areas. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the .gov domain implies government-managed infrastructure. Overall, the technical foundation is solid with opportunities for incremental improvements.
Analyze Another Website