Skip to main content

Is artun.ee a Scam? Security Check Results - Estonian Academy of Arts Reviews

artun.ee favicon

Is artun.ee Safe? Security Analysis for Estonian Academy of Arts

Check if artun.ee is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationEstoniamedium
WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelMailerLite+3 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 3:25:41 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Estonian Academy of Arts is the sole public university in Estonia specializing in higher education across art, design, architecture, media, art history, and conservation-restoration. It holds a leading market position in the Estonian education sector, targeting students, academics, and professionals in creative fields. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive academic offerings, news, events, and multimedia content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Algolia search, ensuring good performance and user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the website's claims, supporting its legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelMailerLiteAlgolia SearchCrisp ChatShareBear

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The Academy operates as a public educational institution with a clear focus on art and design disciplines. Its business model revolves around providing accredited academic programs from bachelor to PhD levels, supplemented by research and development activities. The website's extensive course catalog and event calendar indicate active engagement with students and the academic community. The presence of multiple social media channels and marketing tools like MailerLite suggests a strategic approach to outreach and community building. The institution's market position as the only public art university in Estonia provides a competitive advantage. No evidence of commercial sales or e-commerce was found, consistent with its educational mission.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@artun.ee

Phone Numbers (1)

+3726267***

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, reflecting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contacts were found, and security headers appear absent or not visible in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, MailerLite, Crisp Chat) introduces potential privacy and security considerations that should be regularly audited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The site would benefit from publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and enhancing security headers to improve defense-in-depth.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Estonian Academy of Arts

Description:

The Estonian Academy of Arts is the only public university in Estonia providing higher education in art, design, architecture, media, art history and conservation-restoration.

Key Services:
Higher education in art, design, architecture, media, art history, conservation-restorationResearch and developmentWorkshops and exhibitionsOpen Academy and session studies
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelMailerLiteAlgolia SearchCrisp ChatShareBear
Frameworks:
The SEO Framework (WordPress plugin)
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
MailerLiteShareBear
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well maintained.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.webhost.ee ip4:185.20.101.133 ip4:217.159.236.90/32 ip4:64.90.42.223 a:smtp2.excellent.ee include:re.eenet.ee -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:ujg2ze57@ag.dmarcian-eu.com
Forensic Reports:ujg2ze57@fr.dmarcian-eu.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:185.31.242.106
Name Servers:
ns.zone.eu
ns2.zone.ee
ns3.zonedata.net
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
30: aspmx4.googlemail.com
30: aspmx5.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2025080519, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:53ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mlsend.com include:_spf.google.com include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.webhost.ee ip4:185.20.101.133 ip4:217.159.236.90/32 ip4:64.90.42.223 a:smtp2.excellent.ee include:re.eenet.ee -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Algolia search, and various marketing and analytics integrations. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices such as canonical tags, Open Graph metadata, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple embedded media and third-party scripts. The site uses Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for user tracking, balanced with a cookie consent mechanism. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could improve in security header implementation and performance optimization.
Analyze Another Website