Is arxiv.org Safe? Security Analysis for arXiv
Check if arxiv.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
arXiv.org is a well-established, non-profit open-access repository for scholarly articles primarily in physics, mathematics, computer science, and related fields. Founded in 1998 and affiliated with Cornell University, it serves a global academic audience by providing free access to nearly 2.4 million research papers. The platform is supported by donations and member institutions, positioning it as a leading resource in the academic publishing ecosystem. Technically, the website employs a custom-built infrastructure with standard web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, and HTML5. It is hosted using Google Cloud DNS services, ensuring reliable performance and good mobile optimization. The site is accessible, well-structured, and optimized for search engines, though it lacks some modern security headers and DNSSEC implementation. From a security perspective, arXiv uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place, but could enhance its posture by enabling DNSSEC and publishing explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is strong with a comprehensive privacy policy, though no cookie consent mechanism was detected. The absence of advertising and tracking scripts reflects a privacy-conscious approach. Overall, arXiv.org demonstrates a high level of business credibility and technical maturity, with minor security improvements recommended. The site is safe, professional, and trusted by its academic user base.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
arXiv holds a dominant position as a free, open-access preprint repository serving researchers and academics worldwide. Its non-profit business model relies on institutional support and donations, avoiding commercial advertising or tracking. The platform's extensive subject categorization and search capabilities cater to diverse scientific disciplines, enhancing user engagement. Strategic partnerships with Cornell University and the Simons Foundation reinforce its credibility and sustainability. Growth indicators include a large and growing archive of scholarly articles and continuous support from member institutions. The absence of direct commercial revenue streams suggests a focus on community service and academic dissemination rather than profit.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website maintains a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections active. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are publicly available, which could hinder rapid mitigation of security issues. Privacy practices are strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy and minimal user tracking. The absence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries is positive. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for an academic repository but could benefit from enhanced DNS security and formalized security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
arXiv
arXiv is a free distribution service and an open-access archive for nearly 2.4 million scholarly articles in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics. Materials on this site are not peer-reviewed by arXiv.
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, health
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Soon
HIGHSSL certificate expires in 24 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings