Skip to main content

Is asaimnieks.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks Reviews

asaimnieks.lv favicon

Is asaimnieks.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks

Check if asaimnieks.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
Next.jsReactGoogle Maps API
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:09:24 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks is a Latvian company specializing in professional property management and maintenance services primarily focused on residential multi-apartment buildings in Riga. The company manages approximately 40 properties and offers services including technical maintenance, renovation planning, and resident representation. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and targets property owners and managers in the local market. The business model centers on providing comprehensive property management solutions with a local focus. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, with integration of Google Maps API for property location visualization. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks some accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, there is no evidence of advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating a minimal user tracking approach. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and security posture. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits domain registration analysis, but the website content and contact details appear legitimate and consistent with a small local business. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a local property management company but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparency measures to improve its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactGoogle Maps API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the real estate sector, focusing on property management services in Riga, Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in localized expertise, comprehensive service offerings including technical maintenance and renovation planning, and a clear customer focus on residential property owners. The business model is service-based, generating revenue through property management fees. The target customers are residential property owners and associations seeking professional management. The company manages around 40 properties, indicating a small but established market presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a credible market position. The lack of privacy and security policies suggests room for improvement in compliance and trust-building.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@asaimnieks.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712880****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program, which limits transparency and preparedness. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing regulatory risks. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy concerns but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing incident response and disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks

Description:

SIA Āgenskalna Namsaimnieks piedāvā profesionālus īpašumu pārvaldīšanas un apsaimniekošanas pakalpojumus Rīgā. Kvalitatīva daudzdzīvokļu ēku apkalpošana.

Key Services:
Dzīvojamo ēku apsaimniekošanaInženiertehnisko tīklu un ēkas konstrukciju uzraudzībaIedzīvotāju interešu pārstāvniecībaRenovācijas un tehniskās uzlabošanas plānošanaTeritoriju uzkopšana un uzturēšana
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactGoogle Maps API
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Maps API usage with HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net include:_spf.eunet.lv include:spf.google.com ip4:194.8.8.215 ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:asaimnieks.info@gmail.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:64.29.17.65, 64.29.17.1
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.comDNS only
ns2.vercel-dns.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1752772141, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:125ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net include:_spf.eunet.lv include:spf.google.com ip4:194.8.8.215 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React-based framework, Next.js, which supports server-side rendering and optimized performance. Integration with Google Maps API enhances user experience by displaying managed property locations. The site uses multiple CSS stylesheets and asynchronous JavaScript loading to improve load times. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. However, accessibility features appear basic and could be enhanced for better inclusivity. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags including description and keywords. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization of assets and caching strategies. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website